Pages

Monday, August 28, 2006

Strange Definition of "Harm"

Dean Barnett (posting at HughHewitt.com) points out an interesting item from the NY Times coverage of the released Fox News reporters:
Here’s the New York Times’ lede in its coverage of the Steve Centanni story:

JERUSALEM, Aug. 27 — Two journalists kidnapped in Gaza were released unharmed on Sunday after being forced at gunpoint to say on a videotape that they had converted to Islam. (Emphasis added.)

Interesting locution there, “released unharmed,” no? This comes from the newspaper that believes that a Christmas crèche or a prayer uttered before a high school football game is a violation of the highest order. And yet being forced to adopt another faith at the point of a gun doesn’t rise to the level of “harm” in the Times’ judgment.

Hmmm.

Good point.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are welcome, pro or con, but keep it clean. Your humble host reserves the right to delete comments that don't make the grade. Although anonymous comments are allowed, they're not encouraged. If you can't put your name on it, maybe you shouldn't post it.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.