Rove REALLY Struck a Nerve

I reported earlier on Karl Rove's spot-on remarks about the liberal response to 9/11, and boy the Dems have their panties in a major wad. San Fran Nan Pelosi released this remark:

"Karl Rove has moved to center stage in the theater of the absurd. Our entire country came together after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. His shameful comments trying to revise history insult the victims of 9/11 and all of us who support them. President Bush must repudiate these remarks."

Probable Bush response - not going to happen, Nan. Then Sen. Harry Reid chimed in:

"Karl Rove should immediately and fully apologize for his remarks or he should resign. I hope the president will join me in repudiating these remarks."

See probable Bush response above. Then along came Howard the Donkey:

Dean called on President Bush to "show some leadership and unequivocally repudiate Rove's divisive and damaging political rhetoric."

Dean might have been right about one thing (the blind squirrel theory) - this was damaging political rhetoric...to Democrats.

Then along came the smartest women in the world, Hillary Clinton, who brayed her response during a hearing involving Donald Rumsfeld:

"I would hope that you and other members of the administration would immediately repudiate such an insulting comment from a high-ranking official in the president's inner circle".

See probable Bush response above. I can just imagine Rumsfeld rolling his eyes at that one. Next came Chuckie Schumer:

"To inject politics into this and to defame a large number of people" is outrageous.

Democrats would never do that.

Of course, White House press secretary Scott McClellen was asked about the Rove controvery, and he responded pretty much as I predicted in this transcript from today's press briefing:

Q Last night Karl Rove, in a speech, accused the Democrats of trying to send the terrorists into therapy and not responding appropriately to 9/11, whereas the Republicans, he felt, responded appropriately. He's been called on to make an apology. Will Karl Rove will apologize, and is this elevating the discourse, the way you said the President will do?

MR. McCLELLAN: Talking about different philosophies and different approaches? That's what Karl Rove was talking about. He was talking about the different philosophies and our different approaches when it comes to winning the war on terrorism. And I don't know who is even making such a suggestion.

Q Harry Reid.

Q Nancy Pelosi.

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, I would think that they would want to be able to defend their philosophy and their approach. I mean, I know that the Democratic leadership at this point is offering no ideas and no vision for the American people, but Karl was simply pointing out the different philosophies and different approaches when it comes to winning the war on terrorism.

Q He said the Democrats wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers. That's not injecting politics into the tragedy of September 11th?

MR. McCLELLAN: I think it's talking about the different philosophies for winning the war on terrorism. The President recognizes that the way to win the war on terrorism is to take the fight to the enemy, to stay on the offensive, and to work to spread freedom and democracy to defend the ideology of hatred that they espouse, and the ideology of tyranny and oppression.

Q So will the President ask Karl Rove to apologize?

MR. McCLELLAN: Of course not, Jessica. This is simply talking about different philosophies and different approaches. And I think you have to look at it in that context. If people want to try to engage in personal attacks instead of defending their philosophy, that's their business. But it's important to point out the different approaches when it comes to winning the war on terrorism. And that's all he was doing.

Q So you're suggesting that Rove's approach to discussing the philosophy that Democrats -- is to say that they want to prepare indictments and seek counseling. That's their philosophy, is that what you were saying?

MR. McCLELLAN: I think the comments were saying -- the conservative approach and the liberal approach is what he was talking about.

Q He was saying that that's the comparison in their philosophies?

MR. McCLELLAN: He was speaking to a political organization. There are many who have looked at the war on terrorism and said it is a law enforcement matter, that we should prosecute people. The President recognizes that it is a war and that we must stay on the offensive, we must take the fight to the enemy. The best way to defeat the enemy is to fight them abroad and bring them to justice before they can carry out their attacks here at home.

Q And the therapy? What about the therapy?

MR. McCLELLAN: I think that's what he's -- and I think that's what he's talking about.

Go ahead.

Q Was the rhetoric appropriate?

Of course these are fair questions since the press asked the same questions of Dick Turban Durbin and Harry Reid following Durbin's slander against our troops.......didn't they?