Ninth Circus Places School Districts Over Parents

I reported earlier on the student/idiot at UCSD who was creating porn videos for the local student TV station. Do you wonder where guys like that come from? Perhaps his type is created by the same mentality that gives us the latest outrage from the Ninth Circus Court of Appeals:

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled yesterday against parents who sued their local school district after their elementary-age children were given a sexually charged survey, saying there is "no fundamental right of parents to be the exclusive provider of information regarding sexual matters to their children."

The three-judge panel of the full court further ruled that parents "have no due process or privacy right to override the determinations of public schools as to the information to which their children will be exposed while enrolled as students."

Six parents sued the Palmdale, Calif., School District after finding out their kids had been asked a series of sexual questions in class.

Here's part of the majority opinion:

We agree [with the previous ruling], and hold that there is no fundamental right of parents to be the exclusive provider of information regarding sexual matters to their children, either independent of their right to direct the upbringing and education of their children or encompassed by it. We also hold that parents have no due process or privacy right to override the determinations of public schools as to the information to which their children will be exposed while enrolled as students. Finally, we hold that the defendants' actions were rationally related to a legitimate state purpose.

Given that the Ninth Circus is routinely overturned by the Supreme Court, there's a better than average chance that this ruling will be vacated. However, until it is, you can count on the homosexual lobby, and others who would fill our kid's heads with dangerous sexual ideas, will accelerate their efforts to brainwash the youth of California.