HolyCoast: The Guilt of "Burning Man"
Follow RickMoore on Twitter

Thursday, August 31, 2006

The Guilt of "Burning Man"

Some science wackos are concerned about the impact on the global environment caused by the "Burning Man" art festival in Nevada. In order to assuage the guilt of the participants, they're giving them a chance to attone for their climate sins by paying a pennance into a global warming charity:
With the Burning Man art festival in the Nevada desert starting Monday, a group of San Francisco scientists is busy calculating how much the event contributes to global warming.

Encouraged by the resurgence of the green movement, the scientists are taking a hard look at all those sacred flaming temples, gas-powered scooters shaped like cupcakes, and hundreds of rumbling RVs that converge for a week on the dry Black Rock Desert lakebed.

With an idea that would make Al Gore smile, the scientists have created Cooling Man, an online calculator that determines how many tons of greenhouse gases each of the 37,000 "burners" will produce with their art projects and community camps.

For the first time, Burning Man participants will be able to "offset" their global warming impact much the same way large corporations do, by investing in clean energy projects.


And where will these guilt dollars go?
Then, like corporate America, artists will be directed to mitigate their pollution by purchasing greenhouse gas "credits," or "offsets," by investing in alternative energy that doesn't use fossil fuels: solar or wind power, methane capture from landfills and livestock. Tree planting also qualifies.

Burners are asked to pay $5 to $10 per ton of personal pollution to the nonprofit Trust for Conservation Innovation in San Francisco, which parcels the donations among various renewable-energy projects nationwide.

The money collected from 65 Burning Man participants so far -- $1,000 -- will help pay for a wind turbine that powers a casino on a Sioux reservation in South Dakota. It's the first American Indian-owned wind power plant in the nation.
You mean the Injuns are running a casino that's not making enough money to buy their own wind turbine? That's got to be the worst run Injun casino in the country.

Sounds to me like the proponents of this plan have found themselves a bunch of suckers.

No comments: