HolyCoast: U2 Can Avoid Taxes While Requiring Debt Forgiveness
Follow RickMoore on Twitter

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

U2 Can Avoid Taxes While Requiring Debt Forgiveness

Kind hearted libs are always looking for ways to take money out of the pockets of the rich, or even the middle class, and give it to others. Redistribution of wealth is a practically a tenet of faith for the liberals.

Rock star Bono of U2 has campaigned vigorously for third world debt forgiveness, which of course would be paid for by taxes on those countries who elect to forgive the debt. Bono and his crew, however, are not that excited about contributing to the tax payments:
Oct. 16 (Bloomberg) -- Bono, the rock star and campaigner against Third World debt, is asking the Irish government to contribute more to Africa. At the same time, he's reducing tax payments that could help fund that aid.

After Ireland said it would scrap a break that lets musicians and artists avoid paying taxes on royalties, Bono and his U2 bandmates earlier this year moved their music publishing company to the Netherlands. The Dublin group, which Forbes estimates earned $110 million in 2005, will pay about 5 percent tax on their royalties, less than half the Irish rate.

``Among the wealthiest people I suppose it's the norm,'' Jill Cassidy, 23, said on South King Street near a plaque marking the site of Dublin's Dandelion market, where U2 played some of its earliest concerts. ``In U2's position, it does come across as quite hypocritical.''

The tax move has tainted the image of Bono, nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, and U2 at home. Now promoting a new DVD, book and album, the band is fighting back. Lead guitarist David Evans, known as The Edge, earlier this month defended the publishing company's move as a sensible decision for a group that makes 90 percent of its money outside Ireland.

``Our business is a very complex business,'' Evans said Oct. 2 on Dublin radio station Newstalk, breaking the band's silence after weeks of public criticism. ``Of course we're trying to be tax-efficient. Who doesn't want to be tax-efficient?''

I have no problem with you use whatever legal means are available to pay as little in taxes as possible, but don't do it while demanding that others pay more to support your pet causes.

No comments: