Just a Few Reasons to Doubt the UN Global Warming Report

Neal Boortz has written a piece on his blog which details some of the many reasons why he is skeptical about the UN Global Warming scare report:

• The United Nations is anti-American and anti-Capitalist. In short .. I don't trust them. Not a bit. The UN would eagerly engage in any enterprise that would weaken capitalist economies around the world.
• Because after the fall of the Soviet Union and worldwide Communism many in the anti-capitalist movement moved to the environmental movement to continue pursuing their anti-free enterprise goals. Many of the loudest proponents of man-made global warming today are confirmed anti-capitalists.
• Because the sun is warmer .. and all of these scientists don't seem to be willing to credit a warmer sun with any of the blame for global warming.
• The polar ice caps on Mars are melting. How did our CO2 emissions get all the way to Mars?
• It was warmer in the 1930s across the globe than it is right now.
• It wasn't all that long ago that these very same scientists were warning us about "global cooling" and another approaching ice age?
• How much has the earth warmed up in the last 100 years? One degree. Now that's frightening.
• Because that famous "hockey stick" graph that purports to show a sudden warming of the earth in the last few decades is a fraud. It ignored previous warming periods ... left them off the graph altogether.
• The infamous Kyoto accords exempt some of the world's biggest CO2 polluters, including China and India.
• The Kyoto accords can easily be seen as nothing less than an attempt to hamstring the world's dominant capitalist economies.
• Because many of these scientists who are sounding the global warming scare depend on grant money for their livelihood, and they know the grant money dries up when they stop preaching the global warming sermon.
• Because global warming "activists" and scientists seek to punish those who have different viewpoints. If you are sure of your science you have no need to shout down or seek to punish those who disagree.
• What happened to the Medieval Warm Period? In 1996 the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change issued a chart showing climatic change over a period of 1000 years. This graph showed a Medieval warming period in which global temperatures were higher than they are today. In 2001 the IPCC issued another 1000 year graph in which the Medieval warming period was missing. Why?
• Why has one scientist promoting the cause of man-made global warming been quoted as saying "we have to get rid of the medieval warming period?"
• Why is the ice cap on the Antarctic getting thicker if the earth is getting warmer?
• In the United State, the one country with the most accurate temperature measuring and reporting records, temperatures have risen by 0.3 degrees centigrade over the past 100 years. The UN estimate is twice that.
• There are about 160,000 glaciers around the world. Most have never been visited or measured by man. The great majority of these glaciers are growing, not melting.
• Side-looking radar interferometry shows that the ise mass in the West Antarctic is growing at a rate of over 26 gigatons a year. This reverses a melting trend that had persisted for the previous 6,000 years.
• Rising sea levels? The sea levels have been rising since the last ice age ended. That was 12,000 years ago. Estimates are that in that time the sea level has risen by over 300 feet. The rise in our sea levels has been going on long before man started creating anything but natural CO2 emissions.
• Like Antarctica, the interior of Greenland is gaining ice mass.
• Over the past 3,000 years there have been five different extended periods when the earth was measurably warmer than it is today.
• During the last 20 years -- a period of the highest carbon dioxide levels -- global temperatures have actually decreased. That's right ... decreased.
• Why did a reporter from National Public Radio refuse to interview David Deming, an associate professor at the University of Oklahoma studying global warming, after his testimony to the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee unless Deming would state that global warming was being caused by man?
• Why are global warming proponents insisting that the matter is settled and that no further scientific research is needed? Why are they afraid of additional information?
• On July 24, 1974 Time Magazine published an article entitled "Another Ice Age?" Here's the first paragraph:
  "As they review the bizarre and unpredictable weather pattern of the past several years, a growing number of scientists are beginning to suspect that many seemingly contradictory meteorological fluctuations are actually part of a global climatic upheaval. However widely the weather varies from place to place and time to time, when meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe they find that the atmosphere has been growing gradually cooler for the past three decades. The trend shows no indication of reversing. Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age."

And yet, I didn't see a single news report last night (except for Special Report on Fox) that presented ANY contrary evidence to the "facts" presented in the UN report. Very sloppy work on the part of the UN and the media.