Just as many of their ideas cannot pass muster at the ballot box and end up rammed them through the courts instead, their inability to compete in the free market requires them to take out their enemies via misnamed legislation. If they really believed in freedom of speech, the last thing they would do is promote controls on what can be said and by whom.Some illiberal liberals are trying to restore the luridly misnamed Fairness Doctrine, which until 1987 required broadcasters to devote a reasonable amount of time to presenting fairly each side of a controversial issue. The government was empowered to decide how many sides there were, how much time was reasonable and what was fair.
By trying to again empower the government to regulate broadcasting, illiberals reveal their lack of confidence in their ability to compete in the marketplace of ideas, and their disdain for consumer sovereignty—and hence for the public.
The illiberals' transparent, and often proclaimed, objective is to silence talk radio. Liberals strenuously and unsuccessfully attempted to compete in that medium—witness the anemia of their Air America. Talk radio barely existed in 1980, when there were fewer than 100 talk shows nationwide. The Fairness Doctrine was scrapped in 1987, and today more than 1,400 stations are entirely devoted to talk formats. Conservatives dominate talk radio—although no more thoroughly than liberals dominate Hollywood, academia and much of the mainstream media.
Monday, April 30, 2007
The Fairness Doctrine is Anything But
George Will explains why the left is so anxious to reenact the so-called "Fairness Doctrine":
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment