WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states can require voters to produce photo identification without violating their constitutional rights, validating Republican-inspired voter ID laws.
In a splintered 6-3 ruling, the court upheld Indiana's strict photo ID requirement, which Democrats and civil rights groups said would deter poor, older and minority voters from casting ballots. Its backers said it was needed to deter fraud.
It was the most important voting rights case since the Bush v. Gore dispute that sealed the 2000 election for George W. Bush.
The law "is amply justified by the valid interest in protecting 'the integrity and reliability of the electoral process,'" Justice John Paul Stevens said in an opinion that was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Anthony Kennedy.
Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas also agreed with the outcome, but wrote separately.
Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter dissented.
Breyer probably found something in 14th century French law that bothered him. That's the way he works - looking for precendents outside of American law.
This is an important development. There is so much fraud in our elections, and it's so easy to vote under another person's name here in California, laws like these are important to maintaining some degree of honesty in our election process.
I wish we had a voter ID law here, but with the Hispanic caucus running the state, it'll never happen. They need those illegal alien votes.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment