The "Year of the Bible"?

If the GOP wants to become completely irrelevant, I can't think of a better way of accomplishing that than this:

A Republican House member wants President Obama to make 2010 the year of the Bible.

There's no sign that Obama will get the chance in the foreseeable future. Georgia Rep. Paul Broun's resolution would have no force of law if passed. And it can't be passed unless majority Democrats, who referred it to a committee, bring it to the floor for a vote.

The resolution reads in part:

"The president is encouraged ... to issue a proclamation calling upon citizens of all faiths to rediscover and apply the priceless, timeless message of the Holy Scripture which has profoundly influenced and shaped the United States and its great Democratic form of government, as well as its rich spiritual heritage, and which has unified, healed and strengthened its people for over 200 years."

Told of the measure, several Democrats and liberal and atheist bloggers objected. Some said it would violate the separation of church and state by advocating one book of faith over others.

"If Broun wants to practice his brand of Bible-thumping by legislative 'ministering' to the public, let him get his own damn pulpit outside the halls of Congress," blogged Talking Points Memo on May 13. The Politico also reported on the resolution.

Broun said the nation's values are based on those espoused in the Bible.

"The national year of the Bible resolution reminds us that our great nation was founded upon biblical principles and that religious freedom is guaranteed by the Bill of Rights," he said in a statement. The resolution has 14 co-sponsors.

Unless you're willing to create a special year for every other significant religious text, there's no reason to push an initiative like this. It simply allows the left to make caricatures out of the GOP.