Even though almost all the critiques contained a kernel of truth, in each instance the folks who had the barrels of ink, and now pixels, seemed to come out ahead. So far, the only winner in this latest dispute seems to be Fox News. Ratings are up 20 percent this year, and the network basked for a week in the antagonism of a sitting presidentYou can read the rest at the link. Bottom line, the White House decided to play bully, picking a fight with someone with far less power than they. However, like a big brute who challenges someone small and fast, the little guy is pecking away at the brute and winning.
It could all be written off as a sideshow, but it may present a genuine problem for Mr. Obama, who took great pains during the campaign to depict himself as being above the fray of over-heated partisan squabbling. In his victory speech he promised, “I will listen to you, especially when we disagree.”
Or not. Under the direction of Ms. Dunn, the administration has begun to punch back. On Sept. 20, the president visited all the Sunday talk shows save Fox News’, with Ms. Dunn explaining that Fox was not a legitimate news organization, but a “wing of the Republican Party.”
The one weapon all administrations can wield is access, and the White House, making it clear that it will use that leverage going forward, informed Fox News not to expect to bump knees with the president until 2010. But Fox News, as many have pointed out, is not in the access business. They are in the agitation business. And the administration, by deploying official resources against a troublesome media organization, seems to have brought a knife to a gunfight.
Saturday, October 17, 2009
NY Times: Fox News Wins War With White House
Even the NY Times thinks the fight the White House has picked with Fox News is silly, and according to this piece, the White House has lost. Here's an exerpt:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Disingenuous comment by the NY Times about Fox News being in the "agitation business." I seem to remember the MSM being in the same business when GWB was in the White House.
From my vantage point Fox News seems to be one of the few agencies that are willing to cast a critical eye at The One and his followers.
Couldn't happen to a nicer guy, huh?
"Fewer than 20 percent understand that the central role -- and traditional role -- of a free press in a free society is to serve as a watchdog on government,"
This was from a Rasmussen survey back in 2000 (http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=17631)
I guess now, 10 years later, being a watchdog is the equivalent of being an agitator. Note, though, that when it comes to Sarah Palin, the NY Times, along with the rest of the MSM, relishes the role of muckraker...
Post a Comment