A Delaware first-grader who was facing 45 days in an alternative school as punishment for taking his favorite camping utensil to school can return to class after the school board made a hasty change granting him a reprieve.Zero tolerance policies are a classic overreaction to previous problems. The law requires intent to be proven before a conviction can be made, but in these zero tolerance regulations intent is not a factor, just the possession of the offending item regardless of how it was to be used. Consequently, there's no room for common sense in examining the individual involved and their motivations.
The seven-member Christina School Board voted unanimously Tuesday to reduce the punishment for kindergartners and first-graders who take weapons to school or commit violent offenses to a suspension ranging from three to five days.
Zachary Christie, 6, had faced 45 days in an alternative school for troublemakers after he took the utensil — a combination folding knife, fork and spoon — to school to eat lunch last month. Now, he could return Wednesday.
"I want to get him back as soon as possible. I want to put this behind him as soon as possible," said Debbie Christie, Zachary's mother. "But I also want him to know that he has a voice, and when things are not right, he can stand up and speak out against them."
A spokeswoman for the school district said more changes to the school system's code of conduct were possible in the coming months.
The punishment given to Zachary was one of several in recent years that have prompted national debate on whether schools have gone too far with zero-tolerance policies.
It was not the first such case in the Christina School District, Delaware's largest with more than 17,000 students, which includes parts of the city of Wilmington and its suburbs. Last year, a fifth-grade girl was ordered expelled after she brought a birthday cake to school and a serrated knife to cut it with.
The expulsion was overturned, and it led to a state law that gave districts more flexibility on punishments. But that law applied only to conduct that triggers expulsions, not suspensions.
School board member John Mackenzie told The Associated Press before the meeting that he was surprised school officials did not use common sense and disregard the policy in Zachary's case. The need for common sense to prevail over the letter of the law was a recurring theme among the boy's supporters and school safety experts.
"When that common sense is missing, it sends a message of inconsistency to students, which actually creates a less safe environment," said Kenneth S. Trump, president of National School Safety and Security Services, a consulting firm. "People have to understand that assessing on a case-by-case basis doesn't automatically equate to being soft or unsafe."
Sending a proud Boy Scout to reform school because he possessed a combo eating tool was clearly an excessive reaction.
3 comments:
The Principal that booted the child out for the 45 days is the one who does not have any "Common Sense". Thankfully the School Board made an adjustment and has allowed the child to return to class and not serve the 45 days in an Alternative School for trouble makers. Finally justice has prevailed!
He was still "suspended" for several days, which equated to "time served" (the days he'd already spent at home with his mother rather than in reform school).
Honestly, if I were the parent, I wouldn't be comfortable sending my child back to spend hours per day at a place where the adults in charge are completely incapable of acting like rational adults.
Best wishes,
Laura
I'm with Laura. I'd have grave doubts about sending my kid back into the school in light of the incident. Leaving one's child in the charge of these dimwits?
Post a Comment