HolyCoast: Hillary Watch 2012
Follow RickMoore on Twitter

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Hillary Watch 2012

A few weeks ago, before the Massachusetts Massacre (in fact before anyone serious thought the GOP could win Ted Kennedy's seat), I wrote this in a piece in which I warned people to keep an eye on Hillary:
Here's a scenario that I think may become more realistic as the year unfolds. Should Obama and the Dems continue to slide, and especially if the Dems take a bloodbath in November, I look for Hillary to resign the Secretary of State's job sometime in early 2011. Nobody will believe she wants to "spend more time with her family" so she'll have to come up with another excuse. In reality, she'll be setting the table for a primary challenge to Obama in 2012.

And she'll be very popular. She barely lost the nomination in 2008 and given Obama's performance and her work as Secretary of State, her star probably shines brighter today than ever. For one thing, she hasn't been in the news all that much and we haven't had to listen to her. That's gotta help.

So, with Hillary out of the Secretary of State's office, who will Obama choose to replace her? Here's where the scenario becomes even more interesting - Joe Biden. Biden's many years on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee will be cited as the main reason to move him to SoS, though the real reason will have more to do with the fact that Biden will be a drag on the 2012 ticket. He's not seen as a viable future candidate for 2016 and frankly people are a little bit afraid that something will happen to Obama and we'll get stuck with President Biden.

This will give Obama and his political crew the opportunity to choose his potential successor, someone younger and more attractive as a 2016 candidate. Confirmation could be a bit problematic should the GOP pick up a bunch of Senate seats this year, but I don't know if they will have the stomach to filibuster a vice presidential nominee.

Meanwhile Hillary will be the Ted Kennedy of 2012, challenging the sitting president the way Kennedy challenged Carter in 1980 - only she'll win. The nomination, that is, but not necessarily the White House. That will depend on both the GOP nominee and voter feelings about Democrats in general. After four years of unbridled liberalism the voters may not be willing to take a chance that Hillary will be any better. Her history certainly suggests she just as much a lefty as Obama, though possibly more competent.

Keep your eyes on Hillary - she could be the early warning sign of what's to come for Obama and the Democrats.
Lookie what I found today:
The ongoing decline in the president's approval ratings has more than a few Democrats concerned. The Democratic defeats in the Virginia and New Jersey gubernatorial elections and the Massachusetts Senate race have a number of them running scared, in much the same way that the party's poor performance in 1978 helped propel Sen. Edward M. Kennedy forward to challenge incumbent President Jimmy Carter in 1980.

The chatter has increased in recent days about Clinton leaving the cabinet sometime in the first term, likely over some matter of principle, so that she can position herself to challenge Obama in 2012. Perhaps it is just wishful thinking on the part of those Democrats who have already grown tired of Obama. What is true is that Clinton can still mobilize the political infrastructure necessary to mount an effective challenge to the sitting president. A primary challenge against a sitting president whose approval numbers are above 50 percent and one mounted against an incumbent who is below 50 percent are two very different things, a fact of which the Clinton political team is surely aware.

I'm tellin' you, it's gonna happen.

1 comment:

Ann's New Friend said...

I was thinking about this post early this morning (that would be Eastern time). (Note: you wanted to make us mad, make us think, or make us laugh.)

If Hillary were to beat out the incumbent in the next prez race, Sarah Palin would almost certainly have to run. Palin's candidacy, though taken for granted (especially by terrified lefties), doesn't at present actually exist. And many conservatives (I think I can include you among their number, Rick?) think Palin is not ready.
However if Hillary successfully ran, I can think of no one who could beat her as effectively as Palin.

If your crystal ball is right, we'd better be praying that Palin is getting herself ready. Sometimes in Biblical history the underdog turned out to be God's choice, and one hopes that Palin's own inward resources of judgment would be enough.

Anyway, I'm only saying this vis a vis Hillary. Who else do the Dems have in the shadows? Big O's star is definitely on the wane.