HolyCoast: White House Used Bill Clinton to Offer Bribe to Joe Sestak
Follow RickMoore on Twitter

Friday, May 28, 2010

White House Used Bill Clinton to Offer Bribe to Joe Sestak

Didn't work, and now the whole thing is blowing up Sestak's campaign:
President Obama’s chief of staff used former President Bill Clinton as an intermediary to see if Representative Joe Sestak would drop out of a Senate primary if given a prominent, but unpaid, advisory position, people briefed on the matter said Friday.

Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff, asked Mr. Clinton to explore the possibilities last summer, according to the briefed individuals, who insisted on anonymity to discuss the politically charged situation. Mr. Sestak said no and went on to win last week’s Pennsylvania Democratic primary against Senator Arlen Specter.

The White House did not offer Mr. Sestak a full-time paid position because Mr. Emanuel wanted him to stay in the House rather than risk losing his seat. Among the positions explored by the White House was an appointment to the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, which provides independent oversight and advice the president. But White House officials discovered it would not work because Mr. Sestak could not serve on the board while still serving in Congress.

Mr. Sestak first mentioned publicly in February that he had been offered a job but provided no details, and the White House for three months has refused to discuss it, generating intense criticism from Republicans who accused it of trying to bribe a congressman and deep consternation among Democrats who called on the administration to answer questions.

Mr. Obama promised on Thursday to release an account of the matter, which White House lawyers have been drafting in recent days in consultation with Mr. Sestak’s brother, Richard, who runs his campaign. The White House plans to release its statement later on Friday. Until now, the White House has said publicly only that whatever conversations took place with Mr. Sestak were not inappropriate.
Of course, the White House has already absolved itself of any wrongdoing, but I think there will be additional opinions on that matter that won't necessarily agree.

And I don't think they'll be able to count on Arlen Specter as a friendly witness.

1 comment:

MRedd said...

I don't care who they used: It's direct manipulation of a congressional election by the white house through bribery. Just because a former president carried the "bag money" doesn't make it any less wrong. There is more to this story. We should urge for a grand jury.