HolyCoast: White House Twists Expert's Words to Justify Drilling Ban
Follow RickMoore on Twitter

Friday, June 11, 2010

White House Twists Expert's Words to Justify Drilling Ban

Imagine that:
The seven experts who advised President Obama on how to deal with offshore drilling safety after the Deepwater Horizon explosion are accusing his administration of misrepresenting their views to make it appear that they supported a six-month drilling moratorium -- something they actually oppose.

The experts, recommended by the National Academy of Engineering, say Interior Secretary Ken Salazar modified their report last month, after they signed it, to include two paragraphs calling for the moratorium on existing drilling and new permits.

Salazar's report to Obama said a panel of seven experts "peer reviewed" his recommendations, which included a six-month moratorium on permits for new wells being drilled using floating rigs and an immediate halt to drilling operations.

"None of us actually reviewed the memorandum as it is in the report," oil expert Ken Arnold told Fox News. "What was in the report at the time it was reviewed was quite a bit different in its impact to what there is now. So we wanted to distance ourselves from that recommendation."

Salazar apologized to those experts Thursday.

"The experts who are involved in crafting the report gave us their recommendation and their input and I very much appreciate those recommendations," he said. "It was not their decision on the moratorium. It was my decision and the president's decision to move forward."

In a letter the experts sent to Salazar, they said his primary recommendation "misrepresents" their position and that halting the drilling is actually a bad idea.

The oil rig explosion occurred while the well was being shut down – a move that is much more dangerous than continuing ongoing drilling, they said.
This shutdown could put as many as 30,000 people out of work in areas already hard hit by the spill. It's the kind of lashing out that typifies the reaction of someone who doesn't know what he's doing.

1 comment:

Robert Fanning said...

Lashing out to 'do something' when one does not know what to do is almost always wrong. Even when sometimes the action is good it is by serendipity, not leadership. The experts are to be commended for forcing the administration to admit insertion of policy into technical analysis recomendations.