HolyCoast: Obama's Immigration Raids Fail to Remove the Problem
Follow RickMoore on Twitter

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Obama's Immigration Raids Fail to Remove the Problem

Instead of deporting illegals that are found in workplace raids, the Obama administration policies are simply getting them fired and probably causing many to become wards of the state through social safety net programs:
The Obama administration’s new approach to dealing with companies that hire illegal immigrants results in firings, not deportations, the New York Times reported Friday.

Instead of immigration sweeps at factories and farms which used to lead to illegal workers being shipped out of the country, the administration’s new policy—government conducted audits labeled “silent raids” by employers—usually only result in the workers losing their jobs, the Times said.

The Times article comes just over a week after the president delivered his highly anticipated speech on immigration reform, which was criticized on both ends of the political spectrum.

In these audits, federal agents examine company records to find illegal workers on the payroll, forcing “businesses to fire every suspected illegal immigrant… not just those who happened to be on duty at the time of a raid,” the Times said. This makes it more difficult for companies to hire undocumented workers to fill these positions in the future, the article explained.

These audits reach more companies than the Bush raids, employers said. This year alone, Immigration and Customs Enforcement have facilitated the firing of thousands of immigrants and “levied a record $3 million in civil fines,” the Times reported.

This current policy is a contrast to the Bush-era work-site roundups where undocumented employees were deported en masse. It also represents the current government opinion that treating the nation’s 11 million illegal immigrants as criminals would overwhelm the system.
I wonder how many of these people who have lost their jobs are now receiving welfare or food stamps? When Bush deported them we were done with them - no more expense. Now we're making them wards of the state at great expense to taxpayers.

The old system may not have identified as many illegals, but it certainly was easier on taxpayers.

2 comments:

Sam L. said...

Question: Is this an unintended consequence...or an intended consequence?

And why am I so suspicious?

Nightingale said...

Sam, you're not suspicious, just alert; unlike too many others living in a fog-like state.

Food for thought: more illegals feeding from the government trough, more votes for the Democrats and their social programs.