It's that magical time of the year, so let's play political pretend. Let's imagine Hillary turned down the secretary-of-state job two years ago.Read the rest of it here.I still think there's a path for Hillary to a primary challenge, but Googwin is right when he mentions later in the piece that a challenge to Obama would probably lose Hillary the black vote, and that could be fatal in the general election.
Imagine where she would be now. A leader in the Senate, thinking seriously about challenging a damaged President Obama in 2012, that's where.
And she'd be getting tons of encouragement. She'd be free to join and even lead the chorus of outraged Dems and turned-off independents.
Instead, she's checkmated herself. By hitching her wagon to the shooting star Obama was in 2008, she effectively took herself out of the next presidential election.
It seemed like the smart thing to do at the time. Obama's smashing victory and huge popularity sparked talk of a generational realignment in favor of Democrats.
She'd come so close in the primaries that State was the only job that didn't seem like a demotion. Besides, signing on to his team wasn't viewed as giving up anything in 2012 because there was no hope of challenging him. And 2016 was too far off to game.
But the demigod turns out to have clay feet, and Clinton is now stuck to him. He's fallen and she can't get up.
Wednesday, December 08, 2010
Hillary's Bad Bet
Michael Goodwin has a piece at the New York Post regarding the ramifications of Hillary Clinton's decision to leave the Senate and take the Secretary of State job:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Does that make her a "quitter", like Obama [no, they are both Democrats] and Palin [no, they are both wome...oh wait, that doesn't count.....NO! Palin is not really a woman and besides she is a Republican.]
so Hillary is not a quitter.
But she gave up in the primaries.....Oh I and so confused!
Post a Comment