HolyCoast: June 2010
Follow RickMoore on Twitter

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

ACLU Beclowns Themselves on Arizona Law

What a bunch of morons:
Travel advisories are usually the domain of the State Department, warning Americans about travel into possibly dangerous or hostile countries.

Local civil rights officials say they're doing the same with Arizona.

On Wednesday, officials from the 26 state-wide offices of the American Civil Liberties Union issued an advisory warning people about traveling to "The Grand Canyon State."

The move comes before the Fourth of July weekend and is the latest reaction to Arizona's illegal immigration enforcement law SB1070, which makes it a crime to lack immigration papers in state.

"If you look at it from the perspective of the State Department when they warn people of situations in a foreign country, that's essentially the model we are using," said Hector Villagra, who heads the Orange County office of the ACLU. "If you are thinking of traveling to Arizona you may want to keep this in mind. You may be subject to racial profiling. You may be stopped by police because of your appearance so you need to be aware of that and need to know what to do when it happens."
The next time I have the opportunity to schedule a vacation I'm going to the Grand Canyon.

And the ACLU can sit on it.

Political Quote of the Day

From St. Louis Cardinal's Manager Tony LaRussa:
“This is America, right? You’re supposed to have opinions… I’m actually in support of what Arizona is doing. If the national government won’t fix your problem and you got a problem, you got to do fix it yourself.”
Well, I guess San Francisco, Oakland, Los Angeles, Boston, et al, will have to boycott St. Louis now.

Fat Wizards Need Not Apply

There's only so much weight the old broomstick can handle:
Most people remember the feeling of not being tall enough to ride an amusement park ride, but some would-be riders of the signature attraction at Universal Studios' new "Wizarding World of Harry Potter" theme park in Orlando are being turned away because of their girth. The ride, "Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey," employs individual restraints to keep each guest tucked in to his or her seat, but the restraints aren't large enough to accommodate heavier riders.

Universal seems to have anticipated this issue, stationing staff "wizards" and test-seats along the line and at the entrance to Forbidden Journey. Riders test their ability to fit in the seats, as well as the restraint (which must click three times to be deemed safe and for the potential rider to be allowed into the attraction).

 One Harry Potter fan, Jeff Guillaume of Lansing, Michigan, expressed disappointment on his "Harry Potter" fan site after he failed the test. Guillaume is 5'8" and weighs 265 pounds, and says the restraint wouldn't fit over his torso, though he reports that other rides at the park have special cars reserved for bigger riders.

Universal, which doesn't have "specific weight limits (just the test seats and a requirement that riders be at least 48 inches tall), says the "body dimension" restrictions are "to ensure the safety of our guests. It's #1."

That's all fine and good, but considering the average weight of an American man is 191 pounds (and rising: in 1960 it was 166 pounds), "Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey" could be turning away quite a few potential revelers.
How'd you like the job of staff "wizard" plucking fat people out of line all day?

By the way, for Harry Potter fans the trailer for the 7th movie, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, is now out.  The final book in the series will actually be split into two movies:

Today's Quick Hit Headlines

Some quick hits on today's headlines:
DEMS BLOCK REPUBLICAN REQUESTS TO VISIT SPILL DAMAGE
If you're serious about this, GOP, pay for it yourself.

EPA to open beachside 'Decontamination Stations'...
They needed that long before this oil spill hit.

Former Justice Lawyer Accuses AG Holder of Dropping Black Panther Case for Racial Reasons...
And he'd be right.

Florida brothers selling 'oil-spill water' as souvenir...
Capitalism - you gotta love it!

Venezuela govt to nationalize 11 US-owned oil rigs...
Well, we're not using them.

Gay soldiers subpoena Obama...
Is "subpoena" some new gay code word I haven't heard before? You know, like "outed"?

SIMON: KAGAN'S VAPID, HOLLOW PERFORMANCE...
Weebles wobble when they're questioned.

FBI: Spies Hid Secret Messages on Public Websites...
Just like the guys at Journolist.

Gore sex accuser claims key witness, hotel video surveillance,DNA evidence...
Monica Lewinsky trained her well.

Congressman sees panel voting to end Cuba travel ban...
I wish they'd all go to Cuba...and stay there.

Elin Nordegren Gets $750M, Custody of Kids in Exchange for Silence in Tiger Woods Divorce...
I'd take that deal.

CBS: Obama Mocked Commissions, Then Established Four...
You mean he talked one way and acted another?? I'm shocked!

VIDEO: Ball Hits Cell User in Face at Yankees Game...
If it was a Yankees fan it probably did more damage to the ball than the fan.

Woman blames car crash on vampire...
She must have been on her way to see that new Twilight flick.

Fewer Illegals Caught on Border — But What's the Reason?
Obama's economy might do more to stop illegal immigration than a fence.

Review: Harvard 'Beer Summit' Arrest Avoidable
Yeah, if Henry Louis Gates hadn't been such a jerk he could have stayed out of jail.

KNBC traffic reporter Paul Johnson dies 
This guy had one of the greatest announcer voices...ever.

Gay Marriage Shot Down Again

In a case that is similar to the one currently under way in California, the Wisconsin Supreme Court shot down gay marriage supporters who were trying to overrule the will of the voters:
The Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld the state's constitutional ban on gay marriage and civil unions in a unanimous ruling Wednesday that disappointed gay rights advocates.

The court's 7-0 ruling concluded that the constitutional amendment was properly put to voters in a statewide referendum in 2006. Justices rejected a lawsuit that claimed the amendment violated a rule limiting constitutional amendments to a single subject.

The question asked voters whether marriage should be limited to one man and one woman and whether to outlaw any "legal status identical or substantially similar" to marriage for same-sex couples. Nearly 60 percent of voters approved.

The lawsuit, filed by a voter opposed to the amendment, argued that the amendment consisted of two questions that could have reached different results had they been asked separately: whether to ban gay marriage, and whether to ban civil unions. Polling showed greater support for civil unions in which same-sex couples are granted marriage rights.

Writing for the court, Justice Michael Gableman rejected that argument. He said both parts of the question had the same general subject: preserving the current legal definition of marriage as between one man and one woman.

"The first sentence preserves the one man-one woman character of marriage by so limiting marriages entered into or recognized in Wisconsin," Gableman wrote. "The second sentence, by its plain terms, ensures that no legislature, court or any other government entity can get around the first sentence" by recognizing unions of same-sex couples, he wrote.
A decision is set to be announced in a similar case in California in the next couple of weeks, though with California judges the outcome is always in question even though the case seems as straightforward (no pun intended) as the Wisconsin case.

Saudi Arabia: Iran and Israel Don't Deserve to Exist

This coming from the recipient of Obama's deepest bow:
Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah probably refrained from expressing at least half this sentiment in


his meeting today with President Obama: On June 5, he reportedly told French Defense Minister Hervé Morin that "There are two countries in the world that do not deserve to exist: Iran and Israel."

The scoop comes from Georges Malbrunot, a French journalist with Le Figaro. Malbrunot, a respected Middle East correspondent who spent four months as a hostage of the Islamic Army in Iraq, goes on to report that two sources, from diplomatic and military circles, have confirmed the story. He suggests that the anger directed as Israel was the result of the IDF raid on the Gaza-bound flotilla, which occurred just days before this outburst.
This is an interesting statement given that as recently as June 13th there was a story that suggested that the Saudis would eagerly give Israel overflight rights to attack Iran. I guess once Iran is destroyed the Saudis would then hope the world would go after Israel.

Steve Carell to Leave The Office

The Office has become one of our favorite shows, so this can't be good news for its future:
It looks like Dunder Mifflin will indeed be Scott-free this time next year.

Steve Carell is reaffirming his desire to leave The Office and his role as Michael Scott at the end of the hitcom’s upcoming seventh season. “I think [season] 7 will be my last year,” he told us over the weekend at the premiere of his new animated flick, Despicable Me. “I want to fulfill my contract. I think it’s a good time to move on.”

Asked if there’s anything that could change his mind, Carell said, “No. I just want to spend more time with my family.”

Back in April, Carell made headlines when he announced in a BBC radio interview that next season “would probably” be his last on The Office. NBC entertainment chairman Jeff Gaspin later told reporters that Office producers were “preparing in the event [Carell] chooses to move on.”
I can't imagine this show without Carell. His character and all of its quirks are the glue that holds the whole ensemble together. I think they'd be better off to quit at the end of the season rather than try and continue without him.

The Oil Spill Shows the Dangers of a Big Bureaucracy

The bureaucracy didn't start the oil spill, but based on their actions I'm beginning to think they don't want to end it either.  From Dick Morris in The Hill:
It's one thing to say that Obama's administration showed ineptitude and mismanagement in its handling of the Gulf oil spill. It is quite another to grasp the situation up close, as I did during a recent visit to Alabama.

According to state disaster relief officials, Alabama conceived a plan -- early on -- to erect huge booms offshore to shield the approximately 200 miles of the state's coastline from oil. Rather than install the relatively light and shallow booms in use elsewhere, the state (with assistance from the Coast Guard) canvassed the world and located enough huge, heavy booms -- some weighing tons and seven meters high -- to guard their coast.

But...no sooner were the booms in place than the Coast Guard, perhaps under pressure from the public comments of James Carville, uprooted them and moved them to guard the Louisiana coastline instead.

So Alabama decided on a backup plan. It would buy snare booms to catch the oil as it began to wash up on the beaches.

But...the Fish and Wildlife Administration vetoed the plan, saying it would endanger sea turtles that nest on the beaches.

So Alabama -- ever resourceful -- decided to hire 400 workers to patrol the beaches in person, scooping up oil that had washed ashore.

But...OSHA (the Occupational Safety and Health Administration) refused to allow them to work more than 20 minutes out of every hour and required an hourlong break after 40 minutes of work, so the cleanup proceeded at a very slow pace.

The short answer is that every agency -- each with its own particular bureaucratic agenda -- was able to veto each aspect of any plan to fight the spill, with the unintended consequence that nothing stopped the oil from destroying hundreds of miles of wetlands, habitats, beaches, fisheries and recreational facilities.

Where was the president? Why did he not intervene in these and countless other bureaucratic controversies to force a focus on the oil, not on the turtles and other incidental concerns?

According to Alabama Gov. Bob Riley, the administration's "lack of ability has become transparent" in its handling of the oil spill. He notes that one stellar exception has been Obama aide Valerie Jarrett, without whom, he says, nothing whatever would have gotten done.

Eventually, the state stopped listening to federal agencies and just has gone ahead and given funds directly to the local folks fighting the spill rather than paying attention to the directives of the Unified Command.
There's more at the link.

We've managed to staff these federal bureaucracies with activists who can't see beyond the focus of their agency, and thus many stupid decisions such as those mentioned above are made.  From the beginning of this thing there needed to be a central clearinghouse - a supreme commander if you will - who had the power to overrule individual agencies and do whatever had to be done to protect the coastal waters and beaches, even if it meant the loss of certain sea life along the way.  How many more turtles will die because their beaches will be fouled with oil that might have been kept offshore?

The Obama administration has badly bungled this thing and have proven once again that fallacy that big government is better.

Dems Trying to Give Teacher's Unions a $10 Billion Gift

Of course they are:
House Democrats, who are trying to pass a long-stalled war funding bill this week, have attached $10 billion to help local school districts avoid teacher layoffs when schools reopen.

The approximately $70 billion measure is anchored by President Barack Obama's $30 billion request for the troop surge in Afghanistan and contains money for disaster aid accounts, foreign aid and disability benefits for Vietnam veterans exposed to Agent Orange.

The bill's release late Tuesday night was the surest signal yet that House leaders are committed to passing it this week, despite great resistance among many Democratic lawmakers and deepening anxiety over the Afghanistan war effort among Obama allies such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

The Senate passed an almost $60 billion version of the bill last month. Successful action by the House would send the measure into negotiations aimed at producing a final measure next month for Obama's signature.

The difficulty in passing the bill in the House is magnified by disagreement between Republicans supportive of the war — who insist the measure be "clean" of unrelated spending — and Democrats who want funding for the unpopular war to carry unrelated party priorities. Republicans are threatening to withhold support for the overall package if Democratic add-ons are included.
Dems don't have the guts to introduce that budget-busting union payoff as a stand alone measure, so they attach it to something they think the GOP will dare not oppose. The GOP has to stand strong on this stuff and stop the Democrats from handing our tax dollars to their union buddies.

Leadership Has Its Rewards

Like a 74% approval rating:
Seventy-four percent (74%) of Louisiana voters now approve of the job being done by Governor Bobby Jindal, a 10-point jump from April for the already–popular chief executive.

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in the state finds that just 26% disapprove of the performance of the Republican governor who has taken a hands-on approach to the Gulf oil leak and been highly critical of the response by BP and the federal government.

These findings include 40% who Strongly Approve of Jindal’s job performance and 10% who Strongly Disapprove.

Even as oil washes up on their shores from the still-spewing leak in the Gulf of Mexico, 79% of Louisiana voters believe offshore oil drilling should be allowed, and nearly as many (72%) support deepwater drilling. But then, according to Reuters, President Obama’s six-month ban on deepwater oil drilling affects 38,000 Louisiana workers in an industry that generates about 16% of the state’s gross domestic product.

Nationally, 60% of voters support offshore oil drilling. Forty-nine percent (49%) of Americans favor continued deepwater drilling, while 31% are opposed.
Once again Obama is ruling against the wishes of a strong majority of Americans as he continues to try and enforce the foolish oil drilling ban.  Most Americans understand that we need the oil that's in the Gulf and if we don't get it another nation will and we'll end up buying it from them.

We haven't yet figured out how to power our cars, power plants, or other vital services with rainbows and unicorns.

The Great Oakland Riot

Zombie, who keeps tabs on things in the Gay Bay area, thinks trouble is brewing:
When a hurricane strikes the East Coast or the South, residents are warned for days ahead of time to prepare for the upcoming disaster. But out here on the West Coast, unfortunately, our disasters usually come in the form of earthquakes, which arrive suddenly and with no warning.

So it is with a rare and uneasy feeling that Californians are currently awaiting one of the few West Coast disasters which has been reliably predicted ahead of time. Except this catastrophe is not going to come courtesy of Mother Nature, but instead as what our president might call a “man-made disaster” — in this case, a riot.

Nearly everyone in the Bay Area agrees that a major Oakland riot is brewing if the verdict in the trial of policeman Johannes Mehserle, accused of murdering BART passenger Oscar Grant on New Year’s Day, 2009, comes back anything other than “GUILTY!” The problem for Oakland’s sense of security is that Mehserle is almost certainly not guilty of murder, and the jury is likely to give him a comparatively light sentence or even let him go completely.
Check his post for more information on the case and the signs of pending trouble that are popping up around Oakland.

The greater unwashed part of Oakland is demanding a murder conviction against the cop in question, but as Zombie points out in his post the requirements for a murder conviction simply aren't there. Negligent homicide, yes, but murder one with malice aforethought, no way.

This could be their version of the Rodney King case that led to the 1992 Los Angeles riots.  In both cases those most emotionally invested in the outcome probably don't understand the law.

In Los Angeles the officers involved were acquitted of all charges.  That probably won't happen in Oakland since there seems to be ample evidence of some sort of criminal act, even if it's not capital murder.  I wonder, though, if they'll take the same approach with this guy they did in L.A.?  When they didn't get the conviction they wanted the first time they went after the officers on civil rights charges.  Those charges had a lower standard of proof required, and in my view constituted a clear violation of double jeopardy protections since the officers were essentially tried twice for the same incident.

However, after the riots and all the emotional rah-rahs from the race activists the feds dared not let these guys go without a proper crucifixion.  It was a travesty of justice and turned a petty lifetime thug and criminal into a civil rights hero.  Of course, since then Rodney King has gone on to several other arrests and incidents involving police interaction.

The Oakland case will wrap up pretty soon.  A long hot summer could be in store for Oakland.

Sports Headline of the Day

From Breaking News:
Nigeria president suspends national soccer team from international competition for two years after poor World Cup performance - Reuters
The players will be ordered to go back to their keyboards and spend the next two years sending emails from dying Nigerian royalty who need to wire money to gullible Americans.

Political Video of the Day

Supreme Court Justice-wannbe Elena Kagan can't even tell us if the government can legally order us to eat our vegetables:

Political Cartoon of the Day

Seen on Facebook:

Democrat: Our Borders Are Plenty Secure

Really?  What's with all the people, drugs, guns and money crossing back and forth?
A California congressman known for edgy sarcasm mocked an opponent of illegal immigration during a town hall meeting last week, asking, "Who are you going to kill today?" before the constituent, a self-identified Minuteman, posed his question.

Rep. Pete Stark, D-Calif., no stranger to controversy, mocked the idea that the borders are not secure when asked about the federal government's lack of activity on border security.

"We can't get enough Minutemen armed. We'd like to get all the Minutemen armed so they can stop shooting people here," Stark said.

Eventually, members of the audience urged Stark to offer a serious answer.

"If you knew anything about our borders, you would know that's not the case. Our borders are quite secure, thank you," Stark said, drawing jeers.

Stark resumed his hostile act, asking the Minuteman what he would do to secure the border.

"I would send about about 25,000 troops for one thing and build a wall down so vehicles could not pass," the Minuteman said.

"How high and long would it be?" Stark asked.

"As high and as long as it takes," the Minuteman said, elicting cheers.

Stark said he would start a ladder company with the Minuteman if he designed the wall and doesn't shoot the people coming over.

"But I've got to know how high the wall is and I'll sell a whole lot of ladders for people who want to come," Stark said.

"This is a very serious matter and you're sitting there making fun of it," the Minuteman responded.

"I don't have to make fun of you sir, you do a fine job all by yourself," Stark said.
Pete Stark is a nut, and as crazy as he is, he fits right into his party.

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Political Cartoon of the Day

On day 70 Obama finally accepts international help for cleaning up the oil spill.  I guess he finally decided that rolling SEIU members down the beach wouldn't be enough to get the job done.

One wag on Facebook has Obama's new campaign logo:

Mother Gaia Throws Out the Ceremonial First Hurricane

Gentlemen, start your hurricane preparations.  Although the graphic still says Tropical Storm Alex, it just became a hurricane.:
Or perhaps I should say "Señores, start your hurricane preparations" since it appears the storm will likely skip Texas and harass Mexico instead.  Good news for my friends in Rockport and Houston.

Sleepy Al

Minnesota is really getting their money's worth out of their junior Senator:
He's good enough, he's smart enough, but doggone it — he just can't keep his eyes open for Senate confirmation hearings.

Al Franken, the onetime comedian and current Democratic senator from Minnesota, used his position on the vaunted Judiciary Committee on Tuesday to doodle a lifelike bust of Sen. Jeff Sessions, the committee's ranking Republican, as Sessions raked Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan over the coals.

But it wasn't all fun and games for the former "Saturday Night Live" star — Franken also found time to get in a good nap during the first day of hearings Monday.

Live video from Senate chambers shows a woozy Franken getting some much-needed shuteye as Kagan explains her intellectual approach to life and teachings in her opening statement to the Senate.

But Franken, the most junior member of the Judiciary Committee, had already been forced to sit through an endless round of statements from his senior colleagues on the 19-member panel as they droned on and on and on in the crowded Washington chamber.

When it finally came time for Kagan herself to speak, Franken had apparently had enough.

"I've learned that we make progress by listening to each other," said Kagan hopefully, as Franken slowly closed his eyes and appeared to doze off.

"I've learned that we come closest to getting things right when we approach every person and every issue with an open mind," she said, Franken now apparently lost to the living.

Kagan herself has expressed a profound scorn for Senate confirmation hearings, which she described as empty "lessons of cynicism" — a "vapid and hollow charade" that replace important legal discussions with repetitive platitudes.
This may be one of the few areas in which I agree with the Weeble-like nominee. Confirmation hearings these days are all kabuki theater and little substance. There was a day, before TV came along, when nominees sometimes refused to appear before the committee because they felt it improper to answer questions about their judicial philosophy. They were confirmed anyway.

Franken has spent his entire life being a joke.  It's clearly at the core of his very being, and becoming a Senator certainly hasn't changed that.

Political Quote of the Day

From El Rushbo:
"The leftists got their 'clean, articulate' president. They got every policy wonk in power they ever wanted. They've got all the agenda. They got health care. They got stimulus to create jobs. They got people in homes that can't afford 'em. It's supposed to be utopia out there, and it isn't working."

Political Video of the Day

From the Senate GOP:

Maybe Sarah Palin Can Save California's Universities

Her appearance in Turlock last week netted Cal State Stanislaus $200,000:
Sarah Palin spent only a few hours in Turlock. But the repercussions of her visit will last a long time, from the big money she drew to the debate over her appearance to a legal investigation into the nonprofit foundation that signed her.

Officials of California State University, Stanislaus, said they couldn't be happier with her appearance at the 50th anniversary gala, bringing in the most money of any event in campus history.

"I am really very pleased," university President Hamid Shirvani said Saturday. "It was an extraordinary event, unprecedented in the past five years I've been associated with the university, and according to many, unprecedented as long as they have been with the university."

Stanislaus County Supervisor Vito Chiesa, who attended the gala, said the university achieved its goal.

"I think they hit a home run for raising money," he said. Officials estimated net income at $200,000. "I didn't know what all the rancor was about before; she's there for a school and she turned it into an educational speech."
There's quite a few schools in the Cal State and University of California systems. Perhaps the state needs to hire her to speak and all the schools some some of those smarmy students who protested might be able to get a reduction in their tuitions.

Taking Off The White Sheet

Just as they did with Ted Kennedy, the media is doing their best to canonize recently departed Dem. Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia.  Jim Geraghty has a wrap-up in today's Morning Jolt newsletter:
1. Most of Us Never Saw the World from the Byrd's Eye View
Remember yesterday morning when I told everyone to be on their best behavior about the death of West Virginia senator Robert Byrd? Yeah, sorry about that; I didn't realize the epic scale of the whitewash we were going to have to endure. I got through about midmorning, but somewhere around the headline "With Byrd's death, the era of statesmen fades"I found myself unable to resist wondering whether in his honor today all white bedsheets would be flown at half-mast.

I understand not speaking ill of the dead, but the mainstream media pushes it; the career of Robert Byrd may have set a new record for glossing over horrific past views and behavior, and for praising garden-variety corruption. (See Eleanor Clift 
approvingly note how Byrd would alter the Senate schedule to accommodate his friends' fundraisers.) Pick your angle: His career's dawn, unbelievably racist by the standards of today, a long, slow, sad decline into physical inability to perform his duties (falling asleep on the Senate floorrambling incoherently), and all along, a steady effort to move every last federal dollar back to West Virginia -- and, as I laid out yesterday, naming seemingly every last one of those projects after himself in such a relentlessly, ostentatiously egomaniacal manner that even Kim Jong Il would have declared it a little gauche. Sure, he loved history, enough to dress up as a Confederate general and do cameos in movies. Swell.

Writing at 
Powerline, Scott Johnson lays out the grisly parts many chose not to remember yesterday: "Robert Byrd was indeed a valuable link not only to the Senate's past, but also to the Democratic Party's history as the party of slavery, segregation, and opposition to equal treatment of blacks. [New York Times correspondent Sheryl] Stolberg obviously loved Byrd's cornpone constitutional shtick in favor of filibustering a Republican president's judicial appointees. It's a shame that Stolberg exerted no effort to put Byrd's shtick in the context it merited. Byrd was old enough, for example, to have vowed memorably regarding the integration of the Armed Forces by President Truman that he would never fight 'with a Negro by my side. Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.' Even after his resignation from the Klan, Byrd continued to hold it in high esteem, writing to the Klan's Imperial Wizard in 1946: 'The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia.' And Byrd was old enough to have participated in filibustering the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as well as to have voted against it after cloture along with 18 other Democrats -- in the name of the Constitution, of course. Funny Stolberg didn't invite Byrd to take a walk down memory lane on that subject. It would have been highly illuminating."

I think 
Nick Gillespie lets Byrd off too easily on his past racist acts when he calls invoking them a "cheap shot," but he goes on to lay out: "Byrd's status as the Babe Ruth of pork-barrel spending and taxpayer-funded narcissism that is his real legacy and the one we should never forget or forgive. Here lies a man who pushed his home state tobuild a statue of himin defiance of a rule that such honorees be dead for 50 years. . . . Characters like Rep. Jack Murtha (D-Penn.), another recently deceased pork-barrel prodigy, and Byrd might have been larger than life but they worked to corrode any integrity voters and critics of government might find in legislators. We're grown-ups here in America and we're supposed to be able to take care of ourselves with a minimum of paternalistic help. For the times and places and people who really do need outside help, it fouls the nest when it is administered by folks such as Byrd because it becomes impossible to know if this is a legitimate exercise of state power and assistance or just one more bank job pulled under the cover of often-impenetrable Latinate rhetoric."
David Boaz notes that Byrd was a fair-weather constitutionalist: "He often held up the Cato Institute's pocket edition of the Constitution as he made that vital point in Senate debate. I have several emails from colleagues over the years reading 'Senator Byrd is waving the Cato Constitution on the Senate floor right now.' Alas, if he really took the Constitution seriously, he would have realized that the limited powers it gives the federal government wouldn't include many of the New Deal and Great Society programs that opened up whole new vistas for pork in West Virginia."

Lest you think I'm nothing but nastiness, I offer 
this note from Don Surber: "As a West Virginian, I understand why he was revered: He rose from nothing."
I've never ascribed to the theory that you shouldn't speak ill of the dead. If the dead did things in life that were reprehensible, there's nothing honorable about ignoring it once they're gone.

Race and Geography

First Read has some thoughts on how race and geography could impact this Fall's elections:
Race and geography matter: There are a few reasons why Democrats are more likely to lose the House than the Senate, but one reason that hasn't received as much attention is the issue of race and geography. As it turns out, much of the competitive House battlefield is in mostly white and mostly rural congressional districts. And President Obama's numbers aren't strong here: According to our most recent NBC/WSJ poll, just 36% of whites and 31% of rural Americans approved of the president’s job (By the way, those numbers are about where George W. Bush was with whites from 2006 through 2008). On the other hand, Obama may very well be able to help in several Senate races that could determine the control of that chamber -- California, Pennsylvania (Philly), and Washington state, thanks to the fact his numbers are holding up with urban and minority voters.
Of course, this will give the lefty media the perfect excuse to claim that racism is the real reason Democrats lost the House.