HolyCoast: The Obama Campaign is as Financially Unsustainable as the US Budget

Thursday, March 15, 2012

The Obama Campaign is as Financially Unsustainable as the US Budget

Karl Rove takes a look at Obama's fundraising and he's not impressed:
Last July, President Obama's campaign announced that it had raised an average of $29 million in each of the previous three months for itself and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). I was only mildly impressed. After all, that was well below the $50 million a month needed to reach the campaign's goal of a $1 billion war chest for the 2012 race.

Seven months later, I'm even less impressed. Through January, the president has raised an average of $24 million a month for his campaign and the DNC. Next week, the Obama campaign will release its February numbers, but the president is on track to be hundreds of millions of dollars shy of his original goal.

It's not for lack of trying. Mr. Obama has already attended 103 fund-raisers, roughly one every three days since he kicked off his campaign last April (twice his predecessor's pace).

The president faces other fund-raising challenges. For one, there are only so many times any candidate can go to New York or Hollywood or San Francisco for a $1 million fund-raiser. Team Obama is running through its easy money venues quickly.

For another, many of Mr. Obama's 2008 donors are reluctant to give again. The Obama campaign itself reported that fewer than 7% of 2008 donors renewed their support in the first quarter of his re-election campaign. That's about one-quarter to one-third of a typical renewal rate: In the first quarter of the Bush re-election campaign, for example, about 20% of the donors renewed their support.

There are other troubling signs. Team Obama's email appeals don't ask for $10, $15, $25 or $50 donations as they did in 2008, but generally for $3. Nor are the appeals mostly about issues; many are lotteries. Give three bucks and your name will be put in a drawing for a private dinner with the president and first lady.

This is clever marketing, but it suggests the campaign has found that only a low price point with a big benefit can overcome donor resistance among people who contributed via mail or the Internet in 2008. It also points to higher-than-expected solicitation costs and lower-than-expected fund-raising returns.
There's more at the link.

Bottom line, the GOP will not be facing a billion dollar Obama campaign. He's not going to raise anywhere near that much money, and Obama has already told Senate and House Dems that they won't be getting any funds from him. He's in trouble. His burn rate is going to overcome his campaign goals.

Why do you think every campaign trip includes some official "presidential" speech or visit? That way the campaign avoids paying most of the costs of Air Force One and the entourage that travels with the president. Those taxpayers get stuck with those costs. So Obama comes to the West Coast, does 3 or 4 high profile fundraisers and in between gives an education speech at some school. The campaign's cost for all that travel is minimal. Other presidents have done it, but Obama takes it to a whole new level.

The GOP should not be intimidated by Obama's campaign at all.  He has no record to run on and the fundraising numbers show that Democrats are not enthusiastic about him.  He's very beatable.

1 comment:

Sam L. said...

The Won has a record to run on; but for the GOP, not him.