During his nationally televised press conference April 28, President Bush was asked about the Family Research Council's allegation that some of his judicial nominees have been filibustered because of their faith. After considerable probing by MSNBC's David Gregory, the president said he believed that in fact his nominees were being subjected to these stalling tactics not because of their religious beliefs but because of their "judicial philosophy."I've had a little experience with Gay Days myself, so I can understand why Mr. Pryor would want to pick another time to attend. In his article, Mr. Perkins points out other examples with some of the other judicial candidates. Read the whole thing and you'll see why these judges cause Chuckie Schumer so much distress.
Well, I agree with the president that some Democratic senators have targeted the judicial philosophy of the nominees. But that judicial philosophy has been scrutinized and scorned in several cases precisely because of the nominee's belief system or faith -- not because of his or her record. After all, it was Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) -- not the Family Research Council -- who launched an inquiry into one key nominee's "deeply held personal beliefs." Schumer didn't challenge the nominee's "deeply held judicial philosophy," but rather his beliefs.
And what were those personal beliefs? In the case of former Alabama attorney general William Pryor, as with other filibustered nominees, it appears that it was the nominee's personal views on abortion, homosexuality and other matters on which Catholic and evangelical churches have clear positions that are contrary to those of liberal Democrats and their allies. Pryor failed the Democrats' test because he had spoken out, as a Catholic, saying that abortion is an abomination. He was also questioned about postponing a family vacation with his young children to Disney World because he found out it coincided with "Gay Days" at the park.
Saturday, May 14, 2005
Deeply Held Personal Beliefs
Tony Perkins, President of the Family Research Council, writes in the Washington Post about the real reasons behind many of the judicial filibusters - deeply held personal beliefs, i.e. religous beliefs:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment