The Defense of the Coward

London Times reporter Gerard Baker pretty much sums up the problems facing the Dems these days as it regards the Iraq war (from Political Diary):

"Let me be clear: some Democrats -- Joe Lieberman springs to mind -- supported the war for the right reasons, and continue to do so. Others -- Ted Kennedy, Russell Feingold -- opposed it all along. But most of those now recanting made a straight political calculation in voting to authorize force in the first place. These were the ambitious Democrats who thought they had learnt the lessons of 1991. Then you may recall, the vast majority of the party's senators voted against the first Iraq war... Most of the Democrats, fearing the country was still in the grip of Vietnam syndrome, wanted nothing to do with it. They wanted to be able to say afterwards 'We told you so,' and to reap the political rewards. In the event, fewer than 200 Americans died, and all those Democrats who had voted against the war were suddenly political carrion. So, confronted with a similar choice in October 2002, they did not want to be on the losing side again. If it was another cakewalk, and they had voted against it, the damage to their credibility as presidential candidates would be irreparable. Best to vote for it to burnish their national security credentials. But it wasn't a cakewalk. And now they're trapped. So they resort to the defense of the coward throughout history: 'He made me do it.' Most Americans have better memories"

Let's hope so.