A judge struck down San Francisco's voter-approved ban on handgun possession Monday, saying local governments have no such authority under California law.Of course, most San Franciscans are probably afraid of those evil guns based on their vote, so I guess criminals will still be able to operate pretty much at will in that town.
Proposition H, which passed with a 58 percent majority in November, would have outlawed possession of handguns by all city residents except law enforcement officers and others who need guns for professional purposes. It also would have forbidden the manufacture, sale and distribution of guns and ammunition in San Francisco.
San Francisco Superior Court Judge James Warren agreed with the National Rifle Association, which argued that Prop. H exceeded the powers of local government and intruded into an area regulated entirely by the state. The NRA sued on behalf of gun owners, advocates and dealers the day after the measure passed. Enforcement of the measure was suspended while the suit was pending.
Warren said California law, which authorizes police agencies to issue handgun permits, implicitly prohibits a city or county from banning handgun possession by law-abiding adults.
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
San Francisco Not as Safe for Bad Guys Once Again
In a follow-up to this post, San Francisco's ridiculous anti-gun law has been overturned by the courts:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment