Gimme That New Dem Religion

Following the 2004 election, exit polling information showed that the Democrats had lost partly due to the "religion gap". Dems were seen by voters as anti-religious and they immediately started planning and scheming ways to fool the voters into believing that they were as religious as Republicans. I've done numerous posts over the last couple of years on various ways the Dems were trying to reach out to evangelicals.

Today Time Magazine has a piece on the move by the Democrats to at least appear to be religiously oriented:

A president has to be a preacher of sorts, instructing, consoling, summoning citizens to sacrifice for some common good. But candidates are competitors, which means they seldom manage to talk about faith in a way that doesn't disturb people, doesn't divide them, doesn't nail campaign posters on the gates of heaven. Republicans have been charged with exploiting religious voters, Democrats with ignoring them: Hillary Clinton's voice gets tight as she recalls the mocking response she received when she first spoke in spiritual terms about the longing that people felt to invest in causes larger than self-interest. "I talked about my faith years ago and was pilloried for it," she says, and it is hard to tell if she is more impatient with the conservatives who presumed they held the patent on piety or with the liberals whose worship of diversity all but excluded the devout.

But maybe, she suggests, candidates have learned something from the holy wars of recent years. "Maybe we're getting back to where people can be who they are," she says. "If faith is an element of who you legitimately, authentically are, great. But don't make it up, don't use it, don't beat people over the head with it."

In this campaign season, if Clinton and Barack Obama and John Edwards are any measure, there will be nothing unusual in Democrats' talking about the God who guides them and the beliefs that sustain them. Clinton has hired Burns Strider, a congressional staffer (and evangelical Baptist from Mississippi) who is assembling a faith steering group from major denominations and sends out a weekly wrap-up, Faith, Family and Values. Edwards has been organizing conference calls with progressive religious leaders and is about to embark on a 12-city poverty tour. In the past month alone, Obama's campaign has run six faith forums in New Hampshire, where local clergy and laypeople discuss religious engagement in politics. "We talk about ways people of faith have gone wrong in the past, what they have done right and where they see it going in the future," says his faith-outreach adviser, Joshua DuBois. Speeches on everything from the budget to immigration to stem-cell research are carefully marinated in Scripture. "Science is a gift of God to all of us," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi during a debate on increased embryo-research funding, "and science has taken us to a place that is biblical in its power to cure."

The Democrats are so fired up, you could call them the new Moral Majority. This time, however, the emphasis is as much on the majority as on the morality as they try to frame a message in terms of broadly shared values that don't alarm members of minority religions or secular voters. It has become an article of faith among party leaders that it was sheer strategic stupidity to cede the values debate to Republicans for so long; that most people want to reduce abortion but not criminalize it, protect the earth instead of the auto industry, raise up the least among us; and that a lot of voters care as much about the candidates' principles as about their policies. "What we're seeing," says strategist Mike McCurry, "is a Great Awakening in the Democratic Party."

Of course, the religion of the Dems involves throwing lots of taxpayer money at social issues, regardless of how well those programs have worked in the past. They're not interested in results, just in how those programs make them feel. If they have good intentions, then they've satisfied the call of their lord.

The major issue that has separated evangelicals and Democrats has always been abortion. It's hard to call yourself devout when you not only tolerate but encourage through government programs the killing of millions of innocent babies. However, Dem religion works in mysterious ways and it's pretty hard to sin and fall out of favor with the liberal god when pretty much anything goes. That's what makes the Dem version of religion so appealing to the crowd that doesn't like any form of limits on their behaviour.

If evangelicals turn toward Dem candidates, it won't be because of the newly found faith of the candidates. It will be because they've grown sick of the Republicans, many of whom wear religion on their sleeve but fail to follow up their words with deeds.

Of course, having "family values" Senators hanging out with the local D.C. Madam doesn't help either.