HolyCoast: Bush Vetoes Defense Bill And Directly Challenges Harry Reid
Follow RickMoore on Twitter

Saturday, December 29, 2007

Bush Vetoes Defense Bill And Directly Challenges Harry Reid

President Bush, concerned about provisions in the new Defense Appropriations bill that could make life tough for the struggling Iraqis, has elected to veto it....sort of:
CRAWFORD, Texas - President Bush on Friday used a "pocket veto" to reject a sweeping defense bill because he dislikes a provision that would expose the Iraqi government to expensive lawsuits seeking damages from the Saddam Hussein era.
In a statement, Bush said the legislation "would imperil billions of dollars of Iraqi assets at a crucial juncture in that nation's reconstruction efforts."

The president's objections were focused on a provision deep within legislation that sets defense policy for the coming year and approves $696 billion in spending, including $189 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Also in the legislation were improved veterans benefits and tighter oversight of contractors and weapons programs.

The pocket veto means that troops will get a 3 percent raise Jan. 1 instead of the 3.5 percent authorized by the bill.

Although vetoing this bill is pretty big news, I think the real news in this story is this:
Bush's decision to use a pocket veto, announced while vacationing at his Texas ranch, means the legislation will die at midnight Dec. 31. This tactic for killing a bill can be used only when Congress is not in session.

The House last week adjourned until Jan. 15; the Senate returns a week later but has been holding brief, often seconds-long pro forma sessions every two or three days to prevent Bush from making appointments that otherwise would need Senate approval.

Brendan Daly, spokesman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said, "The House rejects any assertion that the White House has the authority to do a pocket veto."

When adjourning before Christmas, the House instructed the House clerk to accept any communications — such as veto messages_ from the White House during the monthlong break.

A Democratic congressional aide pointed out that a pocket veto cannot be overridden by Congress and allows Bush to distance himself from the rejection of a major Pentagon bill in a time of war.

Bush accomplishes a couple of things here. He gets rid of language in the bill he didn't like, and he throws the gauntlet at Harry Reid's feet concerning these faux Senate sessions. If a court rules that Bush is right in his interpretation of a Senate session, it will clear the way for him and future presidents to make recess appointments as needed.

It's a fight that Bush needs to fight.

No comments: