1. Progressive Republicans (aka: Teddy Roosevelt Republicans) - These are the Republicans who may be solid allies on many issues, but who also seem to want a Great Leader who can do Big Things. They are Crusader Conservatives - generally reliable on limited government, but willing to go off on Big Government crusades.
Illustrative Quote: "The object of government is the welfare of the people," (Teddy Roosevelt)
2. Goldwater Republicans - These Republicans vote for limited government, individual liberty and strong defense; they may have various opinions on social issues, but they subsume those views to the goal at hand: limiting governmentIllustrative Quote: "I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom." (Goldwater
3. Bush Republicans - these voters may or may not care about limited government, but they're willing to accept Big Government, so long as the government does socially conservative things. (See: Mike Huckabee, Christian Democracy)Illustrative Quote: "Prayers can help, and so can the government." - President Bush, February 6, 2008
Of those mentioned, many have fallen into a fourth camp - Status Quo Republicans. They are mostly focused on winning that next election and consolidating their own power.
I'm kind of shocked that one obvious category was left out, and this is where you'd find me:
It's this latter group that is so frustrated with today's Republicans that they could scream, and will be highly unmotivated to vote for John McCain in November. The answer for me to the question I pose in the post title is this: I'm a conservative first, Republican second.Reagan Republicans - like the Goldwater Republicans, are for limited government, individual liberty and strong defense AND conservative policies on social issues coupled with lower taxes.
Illustrative Quote: "In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. From time to time we've been tempted to believe that society has become too complex to be managed by self-rule, that government by an elite group is superior to government for, by, and of the people. Well, if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else? All of us together, in and out of government, must bear the burden. The solutions we seek must be equitable, with no one group singled out to pay a higher price." - President Ronald Reagan, January 20, 1981
No comments:
Post a Comment