@electionjournal: Voter report from Barn that a ballot had been pre-marked for Coakley. Checking on it....
@ericjodom: Huge potential for vote fraud with machines being used in MA http://bit.ly/756rmB
@electionjournal: **VIDEO** Why is this woman handing out blank absentee ballots? http://bit.ly/91Ouot
ALG Foundation Statement on Polling Violations In Massachusetts
Martha Coakley Signs Greet Voters at Polling Locations
Phony Calls Tell Massachusetts Residents Pro-Life Group Opposes Scott Brown
RT @DanRiehl: Vid Report: Coakley Worker Buying Lunch For Poll Workers http://bit.ly/8HeGgN
And this from Big Government:
This afternoon, the Coakley campaign convened a press conference to say they had received reports of voters receiving ballots, pre-marked for her opponent, Scott Brown. It would be a serious charge.But we’re skeptical. Below is a screenshot of Coakley’s website taken this afternoon. The press release making the ballot fraud charge is dated yesterday, before any ballots were issued to voters. (Click Full Screen to view properly)
With such seers working on the campaign (able to foresee possible ballot fraud before it happened), you’d think the Coakley campaign would have been able to anticipate Brown’s campaign surge.
The Coakley release on the allegations now has the correct date on it. It can be found here.
Posts
1 comment:
It's really vile that the Democrats are so scared they may lose this seat that they have to turn to outright lies and untruths.
It is amazing how power corrupts. If the Republicans tried using some of their tactics the Democrats would never stop crying.
Post a Comment