Centrist and right-of-center national security experts reacted with contempt to Attorney General Eric Holder’s claim at a legal convention that the courts are the nation’s “most effective terror-fighting weapon.”Holder has the classic liberal academic view that's not tainted by real world experience. The administration is full of them, which explains why every new set of real world numbers or actual problems are described as "unexpected".
“That’s utter nonsense … it is simply lunatic,” said Ralph Peters, military analyst, author and former soldier. In the war against the jihadis, he said, the courts “have been totally ineffective when they’re not outright destructive.”
“He’s unconsciously shilling for his own profession,” said Michael Rubin, a Middle East expert at the American Enterprise Institute. “Holder, like many ambitious bureaucrats, wants to build a bureaucratic empire … [and] by doing so, he will get Americans killed.”
On Sunday, Republican Senate Leader Mitch McConnell added his voice to the criticism. “The attorney general said the other night our biggest weapon in the war on terror was the U.S. civilian court system,” he said on CBS’ Face The Nation. “ I don’t know what planet he’s living on.”
Monday, June 20, 2011
Who Needs SEALS When We've Got...Lawyers!
Who do terrorists fear most, the SEAL with his assault weapon or the lawyer with his briefs? The Attorney General has some stupid thoughts:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment