HolyCoast: Reverse The Roles in the Trayvon Martin Case and What Would Happen?

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Reverse The Roles in the Trayvon Martin Case and What Would Happen?

Not much (from American Thinker):
What would happen if a black man armed with a handgun confronted "suspicious persons" in his neighborhood? What would happen if the "suspicious persons" were unarmed white teens, one of them was shot dead, and the shooter claimed self-defense?

This is not an exercise in mere speculation. We know what would happen in such a case. There would be no white mobs in the street chanting "No justice, no peace!" There would be no whites holding a "million hoodie march" in New York City. There would be no white equivalent of Al Sharpton, the professional race-baiter behind the 1987 Tawana Brawley hoax, leading marches in the streets of the shooter's hometown. There would be no Federal civil rights investigation by the Justice Department. There would be no comments from a president who seems congenitally unable to keep his mouth shut on matters involving left-wing political correctness. And there would be no national media attention from biased, left-wing "reporters."

We know this because in fact, such an event occurred in 2009 in Greece, N.Y., a suburb of Rochester. Roderick Scott, a black man, shot and killed an unarmed white teen, Christopher Cervini, whom he believed was burglarizing a neighbor's car, with a licensed .40 cal. handgun.

There are many similarities between the Scott-Cervini case and the George Zimmerman-Trayvon Martin case in Florida. In both cases, there had been a spate of criminal activity in the neighborhood. In both cases, the shooters called 911 to report suspicious activity, yet chose to confront the unarmed suspects outside their residence and off their own property prior to the arrival of the police. In both cases, the shooters claimed that they felt threatened, and fired in self-defense. In both cases, local law enforcement applied relevant state law....

Despite the racial difference between the shooter and the decedent, there were no allegations of racial bias. Scott was not charged with a hate crime. There was no Federal civil rights investigation. There were no white protests. The case was settled for what it was: a tragedy caused by a series of poor decisions on behalf of the shooter, and a split-second decision that will forever be second-guessed.
Read the rest of it.  Why didn't this story make national news?  Because black-on-white violence is about as common as dog-bites-man violence.  The media only notices when man bites the dog.

Because the usual race whores getting involved, like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, let's not forget that this is an election year and Florida will be a key swing state. Obama needs his liberal black base fired up if he has any chance to save the state. How better to do that than to create a faux racial crisis?

This Martin story is about politics, not about justice.

1 comment:

Sam L. said...

Stylistic comment: They're race pimps, not whores. They get others to do the work, and they get all the publicity/credit.