HolyCoast: Democratic Convention
Follow RickMoore on Twitter
Showing posts with label Democratic Convention. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democratic Convention. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Dem Convention Money Woes Continue - NASCAR Event Canceled

I'm sure the Dems had high hopes for North Carolina when they booked their convention there, but fundraising is suffering and events are being dropped:
Democrats canceled a political convention kick-off event at the Charlotte Motor Speedway and will move the activities to Charlotte’s main business district, the convention’s host committee announced.

“While we regret having to move CarolinaFest away from our great partners at the Charlotte Motor Speedway and the City of Concord, we are thrilled with the opportunity that comes with hosting this event in Uptown Charlotte,” said Dan Murrey, the executive director of the Charlotte in 2012 Convention Host Committee.

The move comes as party planners are grappling with a fundraising deficit of roughly $27 million, according to two people familiar with the matter who requested anonymity to discuss internal party politics. With a party ban on direct contributions from corporations, the host committee has raised less than $10 million, well short of its $36.6 million goal, said one of the people.
NASCAR was not exactly their target audience since it represents freedom, fossil fuels, speed, and a general disregard of governmental authority. If NASCAR was run by Democrats the cars would be electric, couldn't exceed 50 mph and the races would be no more than 35 miles long...or until the last car loses its charge.

Obama is still planning to accept the nomination in a 74,000 seat stadium, but unless they pack the place with union members who have been paid to be there, I can't see them coming close to filling the place.  It's not 2008 anymore.

Friday, June 22, 2012

The Tarheel Trainwreck

Michelle Malkin has a good piece on all the problems the Democrats are facing in North Carolina, the home of their nominating convention this summer.  Read it here.

One thing I'll be curious about is the attendance at Bank of America Stadium where The One is supposed to accept the nomination.  They had no trouble filling a Denver stadium in 2008, but what's going to happen in Charlotte?  You know they'll do everything they can to fill the place, but Obama's rallies have been pretty weak lately.  They can't afford to have him get up in front of a stadium with thousands of empty seats.

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

If You're a Democrat in a Close Race, You Probably Ought to Skip the Democrat Convention

Do you really want to be seen cheering a failed president's nomination for another term?
Another Democrat facing a close re-election contest is skipping the Democratic National Convention this summer.

Pennsylvania Rep. Mark Critz will not appear at the gathering of Democrats in Charlotte, N.C., to officially re-nominate Obama for president, Shira Toeplitz of Roll Call reports.

Critz spokesman Matthew Mazonkey did not respond to a request for comment from The Daily Caller on Tuesday.

On Monday three prominent West Virginia Democrats — Sen. Joe Manchin, Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin and Rep. Nick Rahall — announced they are not attending the September convention.

Republicans argue that these Democrats are skipping the convention to distance themselves from President Barack Obama.
I think there's also a chance that the Dem convention could be a replay of Chicago '68 with all kinds of nuts showing up to protest. Who wants to have to wade through tear gas to get to the arena?

And sitting out in that half-empty stadium on a hot, humid night for Obama's acceptance speech won't be much fun either.

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Nice Convention Choice You Made There, Democrats

Good luck slamming Wall Street while accepting the nomination at Bank of America Stadium:
The Democratic National Convention could be meeting on enemy territory come September. The state that flipped for Barack Obama last election, making him the first Democratic presidential candidate to win the state in more than 30 years, is increasingly at odds with the White House. North Carolina just banned gay marriage, only weeks before Obama came out in favor of it, triggering a petition from a gay rights group to move the convention. Conventioneers are also certain to face heated protests from union members angry the event is being held in an anti-union "right-to-work" state, and from the jobless in a state where the unemployment rate is above the national average, notes the Daily Beast.

Obama's remaining hope to woo the state may be to beat the populist gong, say observers. “If Obama can strategically place himself as the anti-Wall Street candidate, then that far exceeds the gay question,” Democratic strategist Dave Saunders tell the Beast. But the convention is also inconveniently being held in Charlotte, the world headquarters of Bank of America, which will also be a lightning rod for protests. Obama will be giving his acceptance speech, cringingly, in the Bank of America Stadium. “When North Carolina was picked, it was an excellent choice,” says one election expert. Now Democrats are loath to "admit the state is already gone, but it probably is."
North Carolina barely went for Obama in 2008. They won't make that mistake again and holding the convention there won't change anything.  The Democrats will be a pretty grumpy bunch in Charlotte because by then it will be obvious that they're chances of winning in November will be slim.

Tuesday, May 01, 2012

Dems Plan Their Convention in a State They're Likely to Lose

It was an aberration when the home of NASCAR went for a Democrat president in 2008.  It's not going to happen again in 2012, but the Dems will be holding their convention there (from Morning Jolt):
Democrats Have a Char-Lotte of Trouble in North Carolina


In Roll Call, Stuart Rothenberg thinks the Democrats may regret their choice of convention city:

If national Democratic strategists chose Charlotte, N.C., for the party's national convention because they liked the facilities, the hotel accommodations or the weather in early September, then I guess I can't yet quibble with the choice.

But if David Axelrod and the president's other political advisers picked the Tar Heel State to make some broader political point, then they goofed.

Simply put: North Carolina looks like a mess for Democrats.

The state's Democratic governor, Beverly Perdue, is so unpopular -- her job approval has been fluctuating from 30 percent to 40 percent for months -- that she wisely decided not to seek re-election this year. A recent survey by Public Policy Polling, a Raleigh-based Democratic polling firm, showed only 60 percent of Democrats approve of the job the governor is doing. . . .

Democrats will lose three or four Congressional seats in November, victims of Republican redistricting made possible by the national GOP wave of 2010, which gave both chambers of the state Legislature to Republicans. (In an ironic twist, the governor of North Carolina had no role in the redistricting process.)

But it gets worse.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, North Carolina's preliminary unemployment rate for March stood at 9.7 percent, lower than only three states (California, Rhode Island and Nevada) and the District of Columbia. Apparently, the Obama administration's jobs recovery has not shifted into high gear in the Tar Heel State.

Of course, if the state's economy is a mess, it's still in better shape than the North Carolina Democratic Party.

Two weeks ago, the state party's executive director, Jay Parmley, resigned amid accusations of sexual harassment. North Carolina Democratic Party Chairman David Parker, who accepted Parmley's resignation but seemed to defend him, has also come under fire. Some Democratic activists are now demanding his resignation.

Rothenberg concludes:

For months, I've been including the Tar Heel State in my list of swing territory. I think I've been wrong to do so, no matter what current polling shows.

Unless the president wins re-election nationally by 7 or 8 points (or about what he did in 2008), his chances of carrying the state are not very good. And if he wins nationally by a large margin, he won't need North Carolina.
Obama won North Carolina by three-tenths of a point four years ago -- almost 7 points worse than his national margin of 7.2 points.
I don't think Obama is going to win the national vote at all, but if he does it will be by a slight margin and he'll still lose the Electoral College. Wouldn't that be entertaining....

Thursday, March 08, 2012

Once Again Democrats Want to Have it Both Ways On Gay Marriage

Obama has long been opposed to gay marriage, but he gives the activists a sly wink every now and then to tell them he's really with them even though he does nothing for their cause. Given that some 70% of black Americans oppose gay marriage, it's no surprise that Obama hasn't jumped aboard that bus yet.

L.A. Mayor Anthony Villaraigosa will be the chairman of the Dem Convention this year and he's pushing for a recognition of gay marriage from the Democrats. Not going to happen if Obama has anything to say about it:
The Democratic National Convention may not be so gay -- As in happy. TheDC's Neil Munro reports on trouble in liberal land:

"President Barack Obama’s campaign manager on Wednesday backed away from calls for the Democratic convention platform to endorse marriage licenses for same-sex couples. 'There is a process to go through this discussion,' said campaign manager Jim Messina. By the end of the September convention, he said, 'we will have a platform,' but did not say whether it should include a marriage stance. Instead, Messina slammed opponents of gay marriage."
So, Messina slams opponents of gay marriage without actually committing to do anything about it.  How very Democrat of him.  This issue is still a loser politically in many part of the country, so I expect Democrats will give it lip service at the convention without actually taking a stand in writing.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Dust Off the Greek Columns, Obama Plans Another Stadium Speech for the Democrat Convention

Can he still get 80,000 people to come hear him speak?  I'm sure the DNC will make sure it happens, but it certainly won't have the emotional appeal of the 2008 speech:
Hoping to summon the energy surrounding his 2008 speech at the Democratic National Convention, President Obama will again accept his party’s nomination for president next September at a football stadium that seats nearly 80,000 people.

The president will deliver his acceptance speech at Bank of America Stadium – home of the Carolina Panthers – in Charlotte, North Carolina, the Democratic National Convention Committee announced Tuesday. In 2008, Obama accepted his party’s nomination at Denver’s Mile High Stadium (home of the Denver Broncos) instead of the much smaller Pepsi Center, where the rest of the convention was held.
The man's arrogance knows no bounds.

Since this speech will be in Charlotte, NC, maybe NASCAR should schedule a big race at Lowe's Motor Speedway that night and we can see who gets the bigger crowd.

Wednesday, November 09, 2011

Economic Cartoon of the Day

A big story earlier this week - how the DNC has been banning contracts with non-union employers in preparation for the Democrat Convention in Charlotte, NC. This says it all:

Monday, March 14, 2011

Paying for the Democrat Convention Via Your Electric Bill

If you live in an area served by Duke Energy you may be helping to pay for the Democrat Convention:
Energy company secures credit line for Democratic National Convention out of goodness of its heart -- "Duke Energy Corp., whose CEO is leading the fundraising for the Democratic National Convention, is guaranteeing a $10 million line of credit for the event," reports the Charlotte Observer. "Duke faces increasingly heavy costs from federal environmental rules, and will shutter some of its old coal-fired power plants rather than upgrade them. The utility also plans to build an $11 billion nuclear plant in South Carolina that has to be approved by state and federal regulators. UNC Charlotte public policy expert David Swindell has said Rogers' involvement can only help Duke in seeking energy subsidies from the Obama administration. Others say the company could at least expect goodwill from the party that controls the White House." 
Two problems, Duke: There's no guarantee the Democrats will be in the White House in 2013, and that nuke plant you want is now in serious trouble thanks to the problems in Japan. This will not prove to be a very good investment.

Saturday, February 05, 2011

Labor Unions in a Snit Over Dems 2012 Convention in Charlotte

I had an item the other day on the "union-free Democrat Convention", and now the unions, which pour millions into Democrat coffers every year, are getting the vapors:
In picking North Carolina as the site of their 2012 convention, Democrats didn’t just pick a state that’s relatively unfriendly to unions. They picked the least unionized state in the entire country.

It was a stinging rebuke to one of the Democratic Party’s most loyal and influential constituencies. And labor leaders are fuming at the slight.

The selection was “a calculated affront,” said Rick Sloan, communications director for the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers.

What’s worse, Sloan noted, the convention is set to begin on Mon., Sept. 3, 2012 — Labor Day.

“Going to a right-to-work state and starting a convention on Labor Day for the Democrats?” he said. “Wow. That’s quite the equation.”

Publicly, other than the Machinists, major unions have no official comment on the issue for now. The AFL-CIO, the Teamsters, the government workers union AFSCME, the hotel workers union UNITE HERE and other national unions all declined to comment for this article.
The unions have just become another special interest group that the Democrats have under such firm control they can treat them pretty much as they wish. Just ask gays or blacks how their almost unanimous support for Democrats has worked out for their communities.

Thursday, February 03, 2011

FLOTUS Gets Roasted Over Charlotte Announcement

The home of NASCAR will be full of people who constantly turn left when the Democrats have their convention there in 2012.  The announcement by Michelle Obama made some locals wonder whether she really knows anything about their city:
Charlotte residents were ecstatic to hear this week that their city was selected to host the Democratic convention. But there was one line in the e-mail announcement from First Lady Michelle Obama that made locals say, "Huh?"

In listing Charlotte's many virtues, Obama named southern charm, hospitality, diversity — "And of course, great barbecue."

That was news to residents, who know that North Carolina's best barbecue lies farther afield.

"We appreciate the compliments, and they're all spot-on until that last one," the editorial board of the Charlotte Observer newspaper wrote in a blog post titled, "Charlotte = great barbecue? Who knew?"

"Everybody knows to get the best stuff, you gotta drive north to Lexington," the board added.

A local Associated Press reporter quoted a barbecue expert, retired University of North Carolina professor John Shelton Reed, who said that Charlotte for barbecue was "like Minneapolis for gumbo."

The gaffe was enough to make you wonder whether the White House had simply cut and pasted Southern clichés to create the first lady's announcement.

A Fox News website also implied that Obama's praise for barbecue was at odds with her push for healthy eating, noting in a Fox Nation blog post: "Studies show a barbecue meal weighs in at around 2,500 calories."
The best BBQ in Charlotte is in the pits at Lowes Motor Speedway. Some of those NASCAR teams have pretty good cooks.

Wednesday, February 02, 2011

DNC 2012 Convention - Guaranteed Union-Free

I wonder what the AFL-CIO, SEIU, UAW, and the assorted teacher's unions think about this:
This morning the Democratic National Committee announced that its 2012 convention will be held in Charlotte, NC. Charlotte was selected over St. Louis, Minnesota, and Cleveland; it can be assumed that the city was chosen for its location in the new swing-state of North Carolina, which Obama won in 2008 and that the GOP must win if it has hopes of recapturing the White House.

North Carolina has another distinction: it’s the least union state in the country, with just 3.2% of its workers belonging to a union (coming behind even Arkansas, Georgia, and Mississippi). And the DNC’s host city of Charlotte has exactly 0 (zero) union hotels in which the 15,000+ visitors will stay for the convention. Finally, the host venue in Charlotte, the Time Warner Cable Arena, does not appear to have any union workers. (I called the arena; the operator laughed at the notion that employees would be union members, and a press contact hasn’t replied yet.)

Union leaders had previously asked the DNC to not choose Charlotte or Cleveland for their lack of union hotels. The DNC had said at the time that union representation was one of “a number of factors” the DNC considered in site selection.
There's more at the link regarding the DNC's previous promises to the unions.

According to another report I read Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri asked the DNC not to have their convention in St. Louis. She didn't want the competition for fundraising for her re-election campaign. That call probably cost the greater St. Louis area about $200 million in economic activity.

They REALLY need a new senator.

Tuesday, February 01, 2011

Democrats Will Hold Their 2012 Convention in the Home of NASCAR

Charlotte, NC will be the home of fast women in 2012, and we're not just talking Danica Patrick here:
The Democratic National Committee today announced the selection of Charlotte, NC, as the site of the party's 2012 convention, a clear sign that Democrats will once again target the Tar Heel State in the upcoming presidential contest.

It will be the first presidential-nominating convention to ever take place in North Carolina.
Seems very appropriate for the Democrats to gather where people usually spend all day turning left.

Obama narrowly won North Carolina in 2008, a year in which he had the wind at his back. It's not going to be the same in 2012. I think it unlikely he can win North Carolina again unless the GOP completely falls on its face (and that's always a possibility).

Friday, September 19, 2008

You Too Can Own Bill and Hillary's Convention Speeches on DVD!

Top of the Ticket is reporting that Bill and Hillary have a special offer JUST FOR YOU!
For a $50 donation, you would receive a DVD with her “historic speech in Denver and the inspiring video that introduced her,” the former president writes of Hillary's speech at the Democratic National Convention.

But that's not all.

The package will include a message that “Hillary recorded just for you, where she shares some special moments from her week in Denver.”

But, wait, there's more: “We'll put my speech on there for you too,” the former President says.

But, wait, there's even more.

“For a limited-time only if you contribute $250 or more you will receive the special 'Signature' edition personally signed by Hillary,” the former president writes.

Now, if only she could sell 40,000 of those autographed DVDs, her debt could disappear.

If they'd spoken in the Greek Temple I'd buy one.

Thursday, September 04, 2008

Don't Get Mad, Get Funny

If you were to line the speeches up from the two conventions and compare styles you would notice one striking difference - anger. When the Democrats attacked McCain and the Republicans, it was with anger and rage. When the Republicans attacked Obama, the Dems and the media, for the most part it was with humor. Rudy showed a little anger when he blasted the opposition for questioning Sarah Palin's ability to manage a family and a job, but otherwise the knives were stuck in with humor, sarcasm and wit.

My advice to John McCain tonight is don't get mad, get funny. Humor is more memorable than anger and does more damage. Can anyone quote me any of the angry lines from Obama, Biden or both Clintons? Probably not, but I'll bet you can remember lots of funny lines from Thompson, Giuliani and Palin.

Go get 'em, John, but keep it funny.

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

Why No Bounce?

The polls are pretty much back to where they were before the Dem convention and that has a lot of pundits mystified. Surely the Obamessiah's Greek Temple speech would have have driven voters into throes of ecstacy and given him a 40 or 50 point bump in the polls.

Well, maybe not. Jennifer Rubin at Contentions gives us some reasons why:

How can it be that The One is in a dead heat, that the bounce — if the mini-rise in a couple of tracking polls can even be called that — is already subsiding? There was The Speech! The media all told us he was fabulous! Several explanations are possible.

First, the Denver bounce met the Sarah Palin bounce and the two cancelled each other out. It seems that the appearance of the mother of five with plenty of moxie and anecdotes (and a healthy dose of executive experience) was every bit as exciting and uplifting for McCain as the Temple of Barack address was for Obama. Despite the loony blogosphere conspiracy theories and tasteless attacks against her, the public is intrigued and delighted by her. Hence, she wiped out whatever memories there remained of Obama’s speech after the last firework faded from the sky over INVESCO field.

Second, we keep telling you — it is a really close race. The electorate is evenly divided, the Democrats managed to find a candidate so weak as to counteract the generic ballot advantage, and the two contenders appeal to different groups of voters of roughly the same size. Hence, we return to rough parity after small events are observed and processed by voters.

Third, perhaps the observations here and of longtime pundits like David Broder and William Safire were on the money: Obama’s speech was too angry and negative and it contained too much big government liberalism. He already had people who think everyone is “getting knocked” down and the only solution is to tax the rich and expand the reach of government. Liberals liked him before and they liked him after the speech — you can tell because their spokespeople in the form of the national media told us so. But the people who will swing the election five points one way or the other remained unmoved, it seems, or were least as equally moved by Sarah Palin’s speech last Friday in Dayton.

And finally, the “Celebrity” ad attacks and debunking of Obama’s mass rally-style of politics insulated people from the impact of the speech, or helped to turn off as many people as it excited. Even people who liked the speech had a little voice inside ( the voice of Steve Schmidt, really) saying, “You know it’s kind of silly all this movie set stuff and rock bands –he is running for President.” So the bounce was even briefer and smaller than the Magical Mystery tour bounce from earlier in the summer.
The bottom line: this may prove demoralizing to the Obama supporters and to some extent their media cheerleaders. As for the latter, their reactions and observations ( “It was a symphony not a speech!” Peggy Noonan mockingly recalls one of them exclaiming) have proven again and again to be irrelevant and not indicative of much of anyone who matters in this election. Each time they miss the boat we get confirmation of this reality.

McCain and Palin, if they ever get their Convention, will have their shot at bouncing the polls upward. We will see then whether voters are “unbouncable” or whether The One just isn’t, after all, the one to move undecideds.


I have a feeling that a week from now the polls will be right here again, assuming there's some kind of bump for the GOP campaign. That will depend on McCain and Palin's speeches.

Saturday, August 30, 2008

The Green and The Groin

Here are two stories from The Grapevine that show once again the Dem words don't often match their deeds and that adultery for Democrats is a resume' enhancer:
Green Speak

The Democratic Party said it was making a massive push to make its convention the most environmentally-friendly ever. But CNet News reports the reality was quite different. It says party VIPs and many celebrities who attended told the drivers of their non-green towncars and super-sized SUVs to idle in the Pepsi Center's pickup area with engines running and the air-conditioning on.

The plan to offer a "lean n' green" menu was undercut by the fried mini-donuts that were prominently on sale inside the Pepsi Center. And, green-friendly bicycles were not permitted inside the convention's security area, leading to the use of gasoline-powered vehicles.

Valued Voice?

Apparently admitting to adultery has not hurt John Edwards' market value. Edwards is scheduled to emerge from seclusion soon and return to the public speaking circuit. And, he is now charging a larger fee than ever before.

The Chicago Sun-Times reports the former vice presidential candidate will speak to a student organization at the University of Illinois October 14. His price — $65,000. That's $10,000 more than his pre-adultery rate.

A university spokeswoman says the student group did give the former North Carolina senator the opportunity to back out of the engagement in light of his extramarital embarassments. But the speech is still scheduled to be delivered, focusing on "the American dream."

I wonder if Edwards will give his "Two Americas" speech - you know the one where his wife and kids live in one America and his girlfriend and love child live in another?

Friday, August 29, 2008

What Do Dave Barry, James Lileks, Darryl Hannah, Bird Porn, and the Dem Convention Have in Common?

It's all part of this entertaining Dave Barry column giving you an insight into the Dem convention scene that you probably aren't getting from the TV networks.

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Hope and Change Become Gloom and Doom

So says Victor Davis Hanson at The Corner about the Obamessiah's speech:
Same old, same old of the last two decades.

The convention's final workmanlike message: The country is wrecked. Our freedoms are lost. Our soldiers are victims, not triumphant heroes. We are all impoverished except for a parasitic few. All bad news is not due to globalized changes in a radically different world, but to the nefarious greed of Bush-Cheney-McCain nexus. The Obamas, Kerrys, Pelosis, Gores, et al. who make millions a year and live in mansions, are populists uniquely called upon to tax, expand government, and think of ever new programs, as if the United States doesn't have the largest government and the most ineffective programs in its history.

And this is change? Political transcendence?

Take away the personality cult character of the event and Obama's speech could have been given by any liberal Democrat in the last 30 years.

Nothing new to see here...move along.

The Cult of the Obamessiah

After watching the first couple of minutes of Obama's speech in the Greek temple, does anyone doubt that the Obama campaign is little more than a huge personality cult? The people who have been sitting there for hours are going to need deprogramming before they'll be useful members of society again.

I get the feeling if Obama announced that ushers were handing out the Kool-Aide nobody would turn them down.

UPDATE: Some of the comments at The Corner are classic. Here are a few:

Obama: "A Promise is the Only Reason I'm Standing Here." [Mark Hemingway]
Well, it's certainly not because of his qualifications or experience.

And I Promise.... [Jonah Goldberg]
Never again will Americans step in unicorn poop. Not on my watch!

My Takeaway from this Speech [Kathryn Jean Lopez]
Government can do anything. I've been wanting a Tiffany bracelet...

Yeesh [Mark Hemingway]
There's a fine line between indignant and angry, and Obama is swerving back and forth all over it.

The Transformation is Complete [Nathan Goulding]
Not that many of us here didn't already know this, but for those undecided swing voters in middle America, this speech I think will convince everyone that Barack Obama is who they were afraid he was: just another Democratic politician.

Obama: "This election is not about me. It's about you." [Mark Hemingway]
Is Obama breaking up with us?

And My Fellow Americans... [Jonah Goldberg]
If we all work our hardest, we can make this the best yearbook ever!

Instead of "I Have a Dream" [Kathryn Jean Lopez]
I have a grievance.

Not Great [Mark R. Levin]
This is not a great speech, and it is not a great delivery. Obama is unloading every catch-phrase that has been uttered at these conventions since Franklin Roosevelt. His arrogance punches you in the nose. And he is on the stage way too long. He will be appeal to many because of our times, but hopefully not enough.

I have a new entrant in my "When Were They Lying" game:
Was Barack Obama lying when he called flag pins "symbol of false patriotism, or when he wore a flag pin to his Greek temple speech."
John McCain comments on the speech:
“When the temple comes down, the fireworks end, and the words are over, the facts remain…Barack Obama is still not ready to be President.”